ArticlePediatric pulmonology2025
Azithromycin for Preventing Bronchopulmonary Dysplasia in Extremely Preterm Infants: A Cohort Study.
Article in Pediatric pulmonology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Research progress on risk factors and clinical management ofFrontiers in pediatrics · 2026Review
- [Advances in clinical pharmacotherapy for neonatalZhongguo dang dai er ke za zhi = Chinese journal of contemporary pediatrics · 2025Review
- The shifting landscape of the preterm brain.Neuron · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
Abstract
objectivesTo test the effect of azithromycin in reducing bronchopulmonary dysplasia (BPD) risk in extremely preterm infants (EPI) without pulmonary infection. STUDY
designA retrospective cohort study was performed in EPI in a tertiary unit from September 2018 to September 2022. Since only Ureaplasma species positive infants were treated with azithromycin, we included infants without Ureaplasma species (no azithromycin treatment) and those diagnosed with Ureaplasma species colonization (azithromycin treatment) in the study, while infants with Ureaplasma species pneumonia were excluded. The primary outcome was grade II
resultsA total of 237 EPIs were included in the current study, of which 202 infants were classified as no azithromycin treatment (Ureaplasma species negative) and 35 infants were classified as azithromycin treatment (Ureaplasma species colonization). Clinical characteristics were similar between groups. Infants treated with azithromycin had a significantly lower rate of grade II
conclusionAzithromycin is associated with a reduced risk of grade II
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.