Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39503166›Full record

ArticleJournal of neuroendocrinology2025

Neuroendocrine tumours and pregnancy: Real-world data from an European Neuroendocrine Tumour Centre of Excellence.

Gowri M Ratnayake, Kalyan Mansukhbhai Shekhda, Thomas Glover, Yasser Al-Obudi, Aimee Hayes, Panagiotis Armonis, Dalvinder Mandair, Bernard Khoo, TuVinh Luong, Christos Toumpanakis and 2 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Journal of neuroendocrinology, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

12 authors.

Gowri M RatnayakeNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5237-2207
Kalyan Mansukhbhai ShekhdaDepartment of Endocrinology and Diabetes, University College London Hospitals, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-7884-0403
Thomas GloverDepartment of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-0923-3842
Yasser Al-ObudiDepartment of Radiology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0001-9605-2750
Aimee HayesNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-4417-7716
Panagiotis ArmonisNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0009-0008-3384-2243
Dalvinder MandairNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-5237-8641
Bernard KhooNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-4223-9736
TuVinh LuongDepartment of Pathology, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-7598-7319
Christos ToumpanakisNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0002-1152-7727
Ashley GrossmanNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-1176-6186
Martyn CaplinNeuroendocrine Tumour Unit, ENETS Centre of Excellence, Royal Free Hospital, London, UK.ORCID 0000-0003-0177-1352

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Neuroendocrine neoplasms (NENs) arise from the diffuse endocrine system and have been considered to be rare. However, the incidence and prevalence of these tumours have increased in recent years, and they are being seen in younger patients including women in the reproductive age group. Due to the paucity of data, diagnostic and therapeutic strategies in managing such tumours during pregnancy can be challenging to both treating physicians and patients. This article describes the experience and outcomes of managing pregnant women with NEN at a European Neuroendocrine Tumour Society (ENETS) Centre of Excellence. In this retrospective analysis, we evaluated a total of 22 pregnancies in 18 pregnant women with concurrent diagnoses of NENs who were managed at Royal Free Hospital ENETS Centre of Excellence throughout their pregnancy. These were identified from our tumour registry of 3500 NEN patients between 2015 and 2023. Cross-sectional imaging (computed tomography (CT)/magnetic resonance imaging (MRI)), pre- and post-pregnancy, for each patient was reviewed by an experienced radiologist. Tumour growth rate (TGR) was calculated using the formula: TGR = 100 × [exp (TG) - 1]; TG. [3 × log (D2/D1)]/time (months), where D1 is the tumour size at date 1; D2 is the tumour size at date 2; and time (months) = (Date 2 - Date 1 + 1)/30.44. Tumour growth rate pre-conception (TGRpc) and tumour growth rate post-partum (TGRpp) were calculated for each patient. In a sub-group of patients, positivity for oestrogen and progesterone receptors were analysed on the tumour tissue to evaluate whether the presence of these receptors affected tumour progression during the pregnancy. We also reviewed the pregnancy outcome in patients treated with somatostatin analogues during pregnancy. We analysed the data of a total 22 pregnancy encounters in 18 women: 15 pregnancies (68%) preceded the diagnosis of the NEN, whereas the diagnosis of NEN was made during pregnancy or in the post-partum period in 5 (23%) and 2 (9%) pregnancies respectively. Eight patients (44%) had a diagnosis of a pancreatic NEN, whereas 5 (28%) were diagnosed with mid-gut NENs, and a further 5 at other sites. The majority of the patients (n = 12, 67%) had evidence of metastatic disease at the time of diagnosis. Most pregnancies had a successful outcome (n = 19, 86%), whereas 3 patients (14%) had miscarriages in the 1st trimester. Five patients in total of 6 pregnancies were treated with somatostatin analogues as monotherapy during the pregnancy, and all of them had stable disease after pregnancy. All of them delivered healthy babies without any side effects or complications due to therapy. The average TGRpc was -0.8% (n = 5) and the average TGRpp was +0.96% (n = 6); 2 patients who did not have suitable targets for calculation of TGRpc developed new lesions suggesting disease progression. Moreover, 2 of the 4 patients who have had both pre-conception and post-pregnancy scans showed an increase in TGRpp compared to TGRpc. The management of NENs during pregnancy should be multidisciplinary with an individualised approach to each patient. Somatostatin analogues appear to be safe during pregnancy, though further robust studies are needed. Pregnancy per se may accelerate tumour progression, and patients should be counselled regarding this possibility.

Indexed as

Neuroendocrine TumorsPregnancy Complications, NeoplasticAdultFemaleHumansPregnancyPregnancy OutcomeRetrospective StudiesYoung Adultneuroendocrine tumoursoestrogenpregnancysomatostatin analogues

Identifiers

PMID39503166
PMCPMC11750320

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.