Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39503141›Full record

ArticleAnesthesia progress2024

Stability of Epinephrine in a Normal Saline Solution.

Caroline M Sawicki, Daniel B McKim, Hongrui Wang, Morgan Vasas, Joshua J Blakeslee, Courtney A Jatana, Patrick Dib, Bryant W Cornelius, Spencer D Wade

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Anesthesia progress, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Caroline M Sawicki
Daniel B McKim
Hongrui Wang
Morgan Vasas
Joshua J Blakeslee
Courtney A Jatana
Patrick Dib
Bryant W Cornelius
Spencer D Wade

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: Dilution of concentrated epinephrine prior to intravenous use during clinical emergencies can delay urgent interventions. The objective of this study was to determine whether diluted epinephrine remains stable and sterile over time in common hospital settings. Methods: Epinephrine samples were prepared by clinically relevant double dilution techniques. Samples were stored in 10-mL syringes and incubated under 1 of 4 simulated hospital environments with a mixture of lighting and temperature settings: 4°C/20°C, with or without fluorescent lighting. Samples were incubated for 0, 15, 30, 60, or 90 days. Capillary zonal electrophoresis was used to quantify the concentration of epinephrine and/or presence of any degradation products. All samples were tested for the presence of bacterial growth using blood agar cultures. Results: Diluted epinephrine samples remained stable for up to 90 days in all 4 simulated clinical storage conditions. No bacterial colony-forming units were detected in any of the environmental samples regardless of incubation duration, light, or temperature conditions. Conclusion: Diluted epinephrine for anticipated clinical emergencies may remain clinically useful for up to 90 days, thus improving patient safety, access to medications, and overhead costs by reducing waste.

Indexed as

Drug StabilityDrug StorageEpinephrineSaline SolutionHumansTemperatureTime FactorsEpinephrineSaline SolutionEmergencyEpinephrineNormal salineSafetyStability

Identifiers

PMID39503141
PMCPMC11387972

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.