ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2024
Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders: a narrative review on clinical perspectives and research gaps in the Asian context.
Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.
- Advances in diagnostic techniques for eosinophilic esophagitis: a systematic review of emerging noninvasive methods.European journal of medical research · 2025Pooled it
- Eosinophilic Esophagitis in the Middle East: Insight From a Comprehensive Systematic Review.JGH open : an open access journal of gastroenterology and hepatology · 2026Review
- Non-eosinophilic esophagitis eosinophilic gastrointestinal diseases are more prevalent than eosinophilic esophagitis in Korean children: from a multicenter study based on new diagnostic criteria and nomenclature.Frontiers in pediatrics · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background and Objective: Eosinophilic gastrointestinal disorders (EGID) are a heterogeneous group of conditions, comprising eosinophilic esophagitis (EoE) and non-EoE EGID which have gained considerable research interest. There are likely to be differences in disease characteristics between populations with distinct dietary, environmental and cultural backgrounds. However much of our understanding on EGID have come from studies from Europe and North America. The aim of this review is to summarize the recent developments and updates in EGID focusing on disease phenotype specifically in Asian patients, and identify opportunities for future research pertaining to disease profile in the Asian population. Methods: Original studies, systematic reviews, meta-analyses and review articles up to March 2024 were systematically searched on PubMed, with specific focus on newer studies published in the past 10 years. Case reports, conference abstracts and articles that were not published in the English language were excluded. Key Content and Findings: Prevalence and incidence of EoE and non-EoE EGID have reportedly increased globally over time, but population-based studies are lacking in Asia. Based on heterogeneous data from a limited number of studies from Asia, there are features in epidemiology, clinical phenotype, and treatment response that may be appreciably distinct in Asian patients with EoE and non-EoE EGID, as compared to the Western patient population. Moreover, the efficacy of novel biologic therapies such as dupilumab in the Asian population has not been well-defined. Conclusions: There is a lack of robust data on many basic aspects of EGID in Asia. There is a pressing need to bridge this gap by building research networks and collaborations across wider regions in Asia, to gather high-quality, multicenter data using standardized and uniform criteria and build a more accurate understanding of EGID in Asian patients.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.