Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39503025›Full record

ReviewTranslational gastroenterology and hepatology2024

Predicting waitlist dropout in hepatocellular carcinoma: a narrative review.

Rafael Calleja, Eva Aguilera, Manuel Durán, José Manuel Pérez de Villar, Ana Padial, Antonio Luque-Molina, María Dolores Ayllón, Pedro López-Cillero, Rubén Ciria, Javier Briceño

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Translational gastroenterology and hepatology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

10 authors.

Rafael Calleja *Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-0048-0756
Eva Aguilera *Hepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Manuel DuránHepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-1161-2195
José Manuel Pérez de VillarHepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Ana PadialHepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Antonio Luque-MolinaHepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
María Dolores AyllónHepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-2493-3756
Pedro López-CilleroHepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.
Rubén CiriaHepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-7839-2329
Javier BriceñoHepatobiliary and Liver Transplantation Surgery Department, Reina Sofía University Hospital, Córdoba, Spain.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7027-7898

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and Objective: Liver transplantation is the gold standard treatment for patients with hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). Current allocation systems face a complex issue due to the imbalance between available organs and recipients. The prioritization of HCC patients remains controversial, leading to potential disparities in access to transplantation. Factors such as tumor size, alpha-fetoprotein (AFP) levels, Model of End-Stage Liver Disease (MELD) score, and response to locoregional therapy (LRT) contribute to determining waitlist dropout risk in HCC patients. Several statistical and machine learning (ML) models have been proposed to predict waitlist dropout, incorporating variables related to tumor and patient factors, underlying liver disease, and waitlist time. This narrative review aims to summarize the evidence regarding different prediction models of HCC waitlist dropout. Methods: All published articles up to December 25, 2023, were considered. Articles not based on prediction models using conventional statistical methods or ML models were excluded. Key Content and Findings: Factors such as tumor size, AFP levels, MELD score, and LRT response have been shown to impact disease progression in these patients, influencing waitlist dropout. Most articles in the literature are based on statistical models. Both ML and statistical models may offer promising results, but their application is currently limited. Several attempts have been made to find the best model to stratify the risk of waitlist dropout in HCC patients. However, to date, none of the explored models have been implemented. The allocation of HCC recipients is still based on supplementary scoring systems or geographical criteria. Conclusions: Improving methodology and databases in future research is essential to obtain accurate and reliable models for clinicians. This is the only way to achieve real applicability.

Indexed as

hepatocellular carcinoma allocation (HCC allocation)machine learning (ML)prediction modelWaitlist dropout

Identifiers

PMID39503025
PMCPMC11535785

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.