ArticleAcute medicine & surgery
Adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients: A post hoc analysis of the RESTRIC trial.
Article in Acute medicine & surgery. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Association between high ratio of platelet concentrate to red blood cell and survival among massively transfused patients.European journal of trauma and emergency surgery : official publication of the European Trauma Society · 2026Article
- Adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients: A post hoc analysis of the RESTRIC trial.Acute medicine & surgeryArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
7 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: A balanced transfusion strategy has been a standard resuscitation method for trauma patients, and adherence to a massive transfusion protocol incorporating balanced transfusion is reported to reduce mortality. This study aimed to assess adherence to balanced transfusion among severely injured patients in Japan. Methods: This study analyzes RESTRIC (restrictive transfusion strategy for critically injured patients) trial patients who were cluster-randomized based on restrictive or liberal transfusion strategy. We defined two transfusion groups: massive transfusion group 1, which includes RBC transfusions of at least eight units within 6 h; and massive transfusion group 2, which includes RBC transfusions of at least 20 units within 24 h. Adherence to balanced transfusion was assessed as the ratios of fresh frozen plasma (FFP) to red blood cells (RBC) and platelet concentrate (PC) to RBC ratio >0.5. Results: Among 220 eligible patients, 98 (44.5%) were grouped as massive transfusion group 1 and 38 (17.3%) as massive transfusion group 2. The balanced transfusion in terms of the FFP to RBC ratio was nearly 100% for groups 1 and 2 over all periods. However, the balanced transfusion in terms of the PC to RBC ratio within 6 h were 51.0% for group 1 and 68.4% for group 2. Conclusion: This study revealed that while the ratio of FFP to RBC was balanced among patients from the early phase, the ratio of PC to RBC was not fully balanced, particularly in the early phase.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.