Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502999›Full record

ReviewCureus2024

The Role of WHO Surgical Checklists in Reducing Postoperative Adverse Outcomes: A Systematic Review.

Shehrbano Qaiser, Maham Noman, Muhammad Sheharyar Khan, Umer Waseem Ahmed, Aamna Arif

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Observational
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Shehrbano QaiserSurgical Emergency, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, GBR.
Maham NomanSurgery, University Hospitals Birmingham NHS Foundation Trust, Birmingham, GBR.
Muhammad Sheharyar KhanRenal and Transplant, Oxford University Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust, Oxford, GBR.
Umer Waseem AhmedObstetrics and Gynaecology, West Suffolk Hospital NHS Trust, Bury St Edmunds, GBR.
Aamna ArifRehabilitation Medicine, North Bristol NHS Trust, Bristol, GBR.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Surgical safety remains a critical aspect of modern healthcare, particularly as the number of surgical procedures continues to rise, placing greater demands on resources and increasing the potential for errors. In response to this challenge, various mitigation strategies have been implemented to improve operative outcomes. One such strategy, introduced by the WHO in 2008, is the Surgical Safety Checklist. Despite its widespread adoption globally, its acceptance remains limited in developing countries. This systematic review aimed to evaluate the impact of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist, specifically the sign-in, time-out, and sign-out components, on reducing post-operative adverse effects in surgical patients. A single-step search strategy was employed across multiple databases, including Medline, CINAHL, Embase, Cochrane Database, ProQuest, Index Copernicus, Google Scholar, and Scopus. Additionally, reference lists of identified reports and articles were manually searched to identify further relevant studies. Only studies published in English before September 2022 that focused exclusively on the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist were included. Studies on other checklists or those with confounding factors, such as international surgical outcomes studies, were excluded from this analysis. After screening 17,821 publications based on their titles and abstracts, 93 studies met the initial inclusion criteria and underwent full retrieval and assessment for methodological quality. Ultimately, 13 studies were deemed of sufficient quality to be included in the review. Among these, 10 studies reported outcomes related to complication rates, with nine of them demonstrating a decrease in complication rates following checklist implementation. Similarly, 13 studies reported outcomes related to mortality rates, with 12 reporting a decrease in mortality rates associated with checklist use. In conclusion, the application of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist has been shown to improve surgical outcomes by reducing post-operative adverse effects, including mortality and complication rates. However, further research is warranted to assess the checklist's impact on the quality of life of surgical patients, which would contribute to enhancing its overall acceptability. Continued investigation into these areas will help further strengthen the evidence supporting the widespread adoption and effective implementation of the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist across diverse healthcare settings globally.

Indexed as

mortalitypost operative complicationsurgical safetysurgical safety checklistwho surgical safety checklist

Identifiers

PMID39502999
PMCPMC11536331

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.