ArticleCureus2024
MRI Evaluation of Corpus Callosum Malformation and Associated Anomalies: A Retrospective Cross-Sectional Study.
Article in Cureus, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prenatal MRI features of fetal complete agenesis of the corpus callosum associated with unilateral hemispheric cortical malformation: a retrospective study.Frontiers in radiology · 2026Article
- Rethinking fetal central nervous system anomalies: predicting central nervous system anomalies with corpus callosum to head circumference and occipitofrontal diameter ratios.BMC pregnancy and childbirth · 2025Article
- Long-term cognitive outcomes of Chiari II malformation and corpus callosum abnormalities in myelomeningocele.Child's nervous system : ChNS : official journal of the International Society for Pediatric Neurosurgery · 2025Review
- Paediatric cranial ultrasound: abnormalities of the brain in term neonates and young infants.Insights into imaging · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective This study aims to evaluate the MRI morphology of corpus callosum malformations and the associated anomalies frequently observed in a tertiary care center in northern India. Methods We conducted a retrospective cross-sectional study using MRI reports, images, and clinical records from January 2020 to July 2024. A total of 19 patients with corpus callosum agenesis or hypoplasia were identified, with 17 patients included after excluding those with incomplete records. We analyzed MRI findings for agenesis type (complete or partial), commissural abnormalities, midline anomalies, cortical abnormalities, and posterior fossa abnormalities. Statistical analysis was performed using chi-square tests to compare associations between complete and partial agenesis. Results Of the 17 patients, 52.9% had complete agenesis and 47.1% had partial agenesis. Complete agenesis was associated with higher rates of commissural involvement (44.4% vs. 12.5%), midline anomalies (22.2% vs. 0%), and Probst bundle formation (88.9% vs. 37.5%). Ventricular distortion was more common in complete agenesis (88.9% vs. 40%), and cortical malformations were also more prevalent (44.4% vs. 12.5%). Other anomalies included holoprosencephaly, Dandy-Walker malformation, and hypoxic-ischemic encephalopathy changes. Conclusion Complete agenesis of the corpus callosum is significantly associated with other commissural abnormalities, midline cysts, Probst bundle formation, ventricular distortions, and cortical malformations compared to partial agenesis. This study highlights the varied imaging presentations of corpus callosum malformations and their associated anomalies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.