Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502930›Full record

ArticleOsteoarthritis and cartilage open2024

Association between type III collagen degradation and local tissue damage of a single joint.

Christian S Thudium, Sten Rasmussen, Morten A Karsdal, Anne-Christine Bay-Jensen

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Osteoarthritis and cartilage open, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Christian S ThudiumNordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Sten RasmussenDepartment of Clinical Medicine, Aalborg University, Denmark.
Morten A KarsdalNordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark.
Anne-Christine Bay-JensenNordic Bioscience A/S, Herlev, Denmark.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Objective: The development of disease-modifying drugs is limited by OA's heterogeneity and the challenge of defining clinical endpoints. Serological biomarkers are considered potential surrogate endpoints, but their contribution from single joints to systemic levels in OA patients is unclear. In this exploratory study we longitudinally assessed systemic biomarker levels' response to tissue damage and healing before and after surgery in patients undergoing knee or hip joint replacement revision for aseptic failure. Patients with chronic pain associated with a prior hip or knee arthroplasty, but not receiving revision surgery were included as control. Method: The serological biomarker of MMP mediated type III collagen degradation C3M, associated with synovial tissue degradation, was measured at baseline before revision surgery, after revision surgery and at a 6-month follow-up in 48 patients with aseptic loosening of a knee or hip prosthesis and in 18 patients with chronic pain from a hip or knee prosthesis. Longitudinal changes in biomarkers were modeled using linear mixed models. Results: No differences between the aseptic loosening and chronic pain groups were observed at baseline. Revision surgery in the aseptic loosening group led to a swift increase in C3M, which normalized within 2-3 months. No changes in biomarker level were observed in chronic pain patients over three months. Conclusion: These findings suggest that tissue damage in a single joint significantly impacts systemic biomarker levels and underscores the relevance of systemic biomarkers in assessing local tissue remodeling.

Indexed as

BiomarkersCollagenECMJoint replacementOsteoarthritisRevision surgery

Identifiers

PMID39502930
PMCPMC11535998

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.