Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502899›Full record

ArticleInterventional pain medicine2024

Comparison of curved and straight tip radiofrequency cannula deflection in a ballistic model.

Allen Chen, Udai Nanda, Joseph Solberg, Ethan Rand, George Christolias, Jaspal Ricky Singh

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Interventional pain medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Allen ChenDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Udai NandaDepartment of Physical Medicine and Rehabilitation, Veterans Health Administration, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Joseph SolbergDepartment of Orthopaedic Surgery, University of California - Los Angeles, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
Ethan RandKaiser Permanente Los Angeles Medical Center, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
George ChristoliasDepartment of Rehabilitation and Regenerative Medicine, Columbia University Medical Center, USA.
Jaspal Ricky SinghDepartment of Rehabilitation Medicine, Cornell University Medical Center, USA.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Percutaneous pain and spine procedures play an important diagnostic and therapeutic role in the treatment of various pain diagnoses. Accurate placement of needles or cannulae during these procedures is paramount to the success of these procedures. Objective: The purpose of this study is to examine and quantify the amount of deflection of radiofrequency cannulae based on curved tip versus no curved tip, using a ballistic gel tissue simulant. Materials and methods: Six different types of cannulae commonly used for spinal and peripheral nerve ablations were selected, including 18, 20, and 22 gauge curved and straight radiofrequency cannulae. Ballistic gel samples were made in molds of 40 mm and 80 mm. Each cannula was mounted in a drill press to ensure accurate trajectory. Results: Curved RFA cannula had increased deflection when compared to straight cannula for 18-, 20-, and 22-gauge cannulae at a depth of 40 mm. Curved RFA cannula had increased deflection when compared to straight cannula for 20- and 22-gauge cannulae at a depth of 80 mm. Overall, the mean deflection for a curved cannula increased 1.9x for 20-gauge cannulae and 2.5x for 22-gauge cannulae when compared to a straight cannula. Conclusions: For interventionalists, understanding the effects of needle or cannula shape is crucial for accurate placement. When a procedure requires additional steerability, additional deflection up to 2.5x obtained by placing a bend in the needle or cannula tip should be considered.

Indexed as

Ballistic gelCannulaInterventional painNeedle deflectionRadiofrequency ablationSpinal needle

Identifiers

PMID39502899
PMCPMC11536291

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.