ArticleAPL bioengineering2024
M/EEG source localization for both subcortical and cortical sources using a convolutional neural network with a realistic head conductivity model.
Article in APL bioengineering, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Quantitative assessment of signal quality and usability of EEG and EMG recordings with PEDOT:PSS-coated microneedle electrodes.Frontiers in neuroscience · 2025Article
- Changes in the Spatial Structure of Synchronization Connections in EEG During Nocturnal Sleep Apnea.Clocks & sleep · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
While electroencephalography (EEG) and magnetoencephalography (MEG) are well-established noninvasive methods in neuroscience and clinical medicine, they suffer from low spatial resolution. Electrophysiological source imaging (ESI) addresses this by noninvasively exploring the neuronal origins of M/EEG signals. Although subcortical structures are crucial to many brain functions and neuronal diseases, accurately localizing subcortical sources of M/EEG remains particularly challenging, and the feasibility is still a subject of debate. Traditional ESIs, which depend on explicitly defined regularization priors, have struggled to set optimal priors and accurately localize brain sources. To overcome this, we introduced a data-driven, deep learning-based ESI approach without the need for these priors. We proposed a four-layered convolutional neural network (4LCNN) designed to locate both subcortical and cortical sources underlying M/EEG signals. We also employed a sophisticated realistic head conductivity model using the state-of-the-art segmentation method of ten different head tissues from individual MRI data to generate realistic training data. This is the first attempt at deep learning-based ESI targeting subcortical regions. Our method showed excellent accuracy in source localization, particularly in subcortical areas compared to other methods. This was validated through M/EEG simulations, evoked responses, and invasive recordings. The potential for accurate source localization of the 4LCNNs demonstrated in this study suggests future contributions to various research endeavors such as the clinical diagnosis, understanding of the pathophysiology of various neuronal diseases, and basic brain functions.
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.