ReviewFrontiers in immunology2024
Mechanisms and salvage treatments in patients with multiple myeloma relapsed post-BCMA CAR-T cell therapy.
Review in Frontiers in immunology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 8 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
8 citing papers in PubMed.
- RNA-Based Therapeutic Strategies in Multiple Myeloma: From Molecular Targets to Delivery and Clinical Translation.International journal of molecular sciences · 2026Review
- Integrin alpha8beta1 is Identified as a Potential CAR-T Target for BCMA-Resistant Relapsed Multiple Myeloma.ImmunoTargets and therapy · 2026Article
- Beyond exhaustion: T cell fitness for next generation of immunotherapy for hematological cancer.Frontiers in immunology · 2026Review
- Targets for CAR Therapy in Multiple Myeloma.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- From Molecular Precision to Clinical Practice: A Comprehensive Review of Bispecific and Trispecific Antibodies in Hematologic Malignancies.International journal of molecular sciences · 2025Review
- Mechanisms of resistance to CAR-T cell therapy in multiple myeloma: latest updates from the 2024 ASH annual meeting.Experimental hematology & oncology · 2025Article
- Strategies for salvage therapy post CAR-T therapy failure in refractory/relapsed multiple myeloma patients.Frontiers in pharmacology · 2025Review
- Long-term follow-up of patients with relapsed/refractory multiple myeloma after BCMA CAR-T-cell therapy.Frontiers in immunology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Chimeric antigen receptor T-cell (CAR-T) therapy has ushered in a new era for the treatment of multiple myeloma (MM). Numerous clinical studies, especially those involving B-cell maturation antigen (BCMA)-directed CAR-T, have shown remarkable efficacy in patients with relapsed or refractory multiple myeloma (R/R MM). However, a considerable number of patients still experience disease recurrence or progression after BCMA CAR-T treatment, which is attributed to various factors, including antigen escape, CAR-T manufacturing factors, T cell exhaustion, inhibitory effects of tumor microenvironment and impact of prior treatments. The scarcity of effective treatment options following post-CAR-T disease recurrence, coupled with the lack of well-established salvage regimens, leaves patients who do relapse facing a bleak prognosis. In recent years, some academic institutions have achieved certain results in salvage treatments of patients with relapse after BCMA CAR-T treatment through secondary infusion of BCMA CAR-T, changing to non-BCMA-directed CAR-T, double-target CAR-T, bispecific antibodies or other novel therapies. This review summarizes the mechanisms of resistance or relapse after BCMA CAR-T administration and the available data on current salvage treatments, hoping to provide ideas for optimizing clinical salvage therapies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.