Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502667›Full record

ArticlemedRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences2024

Telemedicine in Eye Care During the COVID-19 Pandemic: A Review of Patient & Physician Perspectives.

Christina Perjuhi Halajyan, Jonathan Thomas, Benjamin Xu, Jeffrey Gluckstein, Xuejuan Jiang

Abstract readPreprint
In one paragraph

Article in medRxiv : the preprint server for health sciences, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Christina Perjuhi HalajyanDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jonathan ThomasTexas A&M School of Medicine, Bryan, TX, United States.ORCID 0009-0003-2340-3056
Benjamin XuDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Jeffrey GlucksteinDepartment of Ophthalmology, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.
Xuejuan JiangDepartment of Population and Public Health Sciences, University of Southern California Keck School of Medicine, Los Angeles, CA, United States.ORCID 0000-0002-5637-666X

Funding

Intrauterine exposure to tobacco smoke, DNA methylation, and vision disorders in preschool childrenR01EY030560 · NEI · UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA · PI JIANG, XUEJUAN · 2019 to 2023
$2.0M
NEI NIH HHS R01 EY030560
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Purpose: There has been an increase in the adoption of telemedicine during the COVID-19 pandemic. This review used systematic search and review criteria to assess the literature on patient and physician perspectives toward telemedicine for vision care during the pandemic. Methods: We conducted a comprehensive search on PubMed, Embase, and Scopus using relevant MeSH terms to identify peer-reviewed studies examining telemedicine use in eye care during the pandemic. The search strategy encompassed three key concepts: COVID-19 or pandemic, telehealth or telemedicine, and eye care. Further screening of references and similar articles was conducted to identify additional relevant studies. Results: We identified 24 relevant studies published between 2020 and 2022. Of these, 15 focused on patients' perspectives, while 12 explored physicians' perspectives. Predominantly cross-sectional in design, these studies were mainly conducted during the initial wave of the pandemic (March 2020 to June 2020), primarily in urban locations and hospital settings. Patients were satisfied with telemedicine and considered it equally effective to in-person visits. Patients believed telemedicine was convenient, improved eye care access, and a beneficial triage tool. Physicians acknowledged telemedicine's convenience for follow-up assessment and its ability to expand the capacity for emergency cases. However, both patients and physicians voiced concerns about the absence of ancillary examination and technological challenges. Conclusion: Our review highlights the positive impact of telemedicine in eye care during the pandemic. Nonetheless, most studies were limited in sample size. They did not delve into potential disparities based on race/ethnicity, socioeconomic status, and geographic location, factors that could influence patient attitudes toward telemedicine. Further research is warranted to validate the findings from our selected studies and explore factors that influence the implementation of telemedicine, particularly across various eye care subspecialties.

Indexed as

COVID-19 pandemicOphthalmologypatient satisfactionphysician satisfactiontelemedicine

Identifiers

PMID39502667
PMCPMC11537333

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.