Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502645›Full record

ReviewFrontiers in medicine2024

Extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in critically ill patients with active hematologic and non-hematologic malignancy: a literature review.

Roberto Rabello Filho, Daniel Joelsons, Bruno de Arruda Bravim

Abstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Frontiers in medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
3citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

3 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Review
  3. Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Roberto Rabello Filho *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Daniel Joelsons *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.
Bruno de Arruda BravimDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Hospital Israelita Albert Einstein, São Paulo, Brazil.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Combined progress in oncology and critical care medicine has led to new aspirations and discussions in advanced life support modalities in the intensive care unit. Over the last decade, extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, previously considered unsuitable for oncologic patients, has become increasingly popular, with more diverse applications. Nevertheless, mortality remains high in critically ill cancer patients, and eligibility for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation can be extremely challenging. This scenario is even more difficult due to the uncertain prognosis regarding the underlying malignancy, the increased rate of infections related to intensive care unit admission, and the high risk of adverse events during extracorporeal membrane oxygenation support. With advances in technology and better management involving extracorporeal membrane oxygenation, new data on clinical outcomes can be found. Therefore, this review article evaluates the indicators for extracorporeal membrane oxygenation in different types of oncology patients and the possible subgroups that could benefit from it. Furthermore, we highlight the prognosis, the risk factors for complications during this support, and the importance of decision-making based on a multidisciplinary team in the extracorporeal membrane oxygenation indication.

Indexed as

extracorporeal membrane oxygenationhematologyintensive care unitmalignancyoncology

Identifiers

PMID39502645
PMCPMC11534720

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.