ArticleCancer diagnosis & prognosis
Drainage Fluid Amylase as a Biomarker for the Detection of Anastomotic Leakage After Low Anterior Resection of Rectal Cancer: A Two-center Study.
Article in Cancer diagnosis & prognosis. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Review
- Invited Commentary: Management of Low Colorectal/Coloanal Anastomotic Leak: Results of a French National Inter-Groups Practice Survey.World journal of surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Aim: This study aimed to investigate the utility of measuring amylase levels in drainage fluid (DFA) for early, non-invasive detection of anastomotic leakage (AL) in undergoing low anterior resection (LAR) for rectal cancer. Patients and Methods: This prospective observational cohort study analyzed drainage fluid samples from patients who underwent LAR for rectal cancer at two medical centers between February 2021 and December 2023. DFA levels were measured on postoperative days (PODs) 1, 3, and 5. AL was confirmed by clinical evidence and radiological imaging. Statistical analyses were performed to evaluate the diagnostic performance of DFA. Results: Of 120 LAR cases, AL occurred in five (4.16%). DFA levels on POD 3 and 5 were significantly higher in the AL than in the non-AL group (p<0.0001). DFA on POD 5 had the highest diagnostic accuracy for early AL detection, with an area under the curve of 0.99, achieving 100% sensitivity and 99.5% specificity at a cutoff of 846 U/l. A DFA >846 U/l predicted AL with negative predictive and positive predictive values of 83.3% and 100%, respectively, on POD 5. Conclusion: Measuring DFA is a non-invasive, simple and cost-effective method for early AL detection in patients with rectal cancer undergoing LAR. Our findings also suggested that drain placement may be useful for the early detection of AL through DFA measurement.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.