Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502579›Full record

ArticleBiomicrofluidics2024

Microfluidics for foodborne bacteria analysis: Moving toward multiple technologies integration.

Gaowa Xing, Jin-Ming Lin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Biomicrofluidics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Advances in biosensors for bacterial detection and identification.World journal of microbiology & biotechnology · 2025
    Review
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

2 authors.

Jin-Ming LinBeijing Key Laboratory of Microanalytical Methods and Instrumentation, Key Laboratory of Bioorganic Phosphorus Chemistry and Chemical Biology (Ministry of Education), Department of Chemistry, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0001-8891-0655

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Food security related to bacterial pathogens has seriously threatened human life and caused public health problems. Most of the reported methods are targeted at known major pathogens commonly found in food samples, but to some extent, they have the disadvantage of lacking simplicity, speed, high throughput, and high sensitivity. Microfluidics has become a promising tool for foodborne bacteria analysis and addresses the above limitations. In this perspective, we briefly discussed the ongoing research and development in this field. We outline the major types of microfluidics, the strategies of target biorecognition, and signal amplification technologies in the microfluidic system for the foodborne bacteria analysis. We also proposed the future directions of microfluidics for foodborne bacterial analysis, which aims to integrate multiple technologies toward intelligent analysis with high selectivity and sensitivity for unknown samples, multiple bacterial detection, and simultaneous detection of multiple food pollutants.

Identifiers

PMID39502579
PMCPMC11537706

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.