Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502563›Full record

ArticleACS ES&T air2024

Air Quality Sensor Experts Convene: Current Quality Assurance Considerations for Credible Data.

Karoline K Barkjohn, Andrea Clements, Corey Mocka, Colin Barrette, Ashley Bittner, Wyatt Champion, Brett Gantt, Elizabeth Good, Amara Holder, Berkley Hillis and 12 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in ACS ES&T air, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
10citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

10 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Field Evaluation of Community Condensation Particle Counters, Optical Particle Counters, and a Low-Cost Particle Sensor.Aerosol science and technology : the journal of the American Association for Aerosol Research · 2026
    Article
  3. Article
  4. Sensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
  7. Article
  8. SENTINEL: A Shiny App for Processing and Analysis of Fenceline Sensor Data.Environmental modelling & software : with environment data news · 2025
    Article
  9. Evaluation of Long-Term Performance of Six PMSensors (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025
    Article
  10. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Karoline K BarkjohnUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Andrea ClementsUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Corey MockaUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Colin BarretteUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Ashley BittnerUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Wyatt ChampionUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Brett GanttUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Elizabeth GoodUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Amara HolderUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Berkley HillisUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Air Quality Planning and Standards, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Matthew S LandisUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Menaka KumarNational Student Services Contractor, hosted by the United States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Megan MacDonaldUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Eben ThomaUnited States Environmental Protection Agency, Office of Research and Development, Research Triangle Park, North Carolina 27711, United States.
Tim DyeTD Environmental Services, LLC, Petaluma, California, 94952, United States.
Jan-Michael ArcherUniversity of Maryland School of Public Health, College Park, Maryland 20742-2611, United States.
Michael BerginDuke University, Department of Civil and Environmental Engineering, Durham, NC 27708, United States.
Wilton MuiSouth Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, California 91765, United States.
Brandon FeenstraSouth Coast Air Quality Management District, Diamond Bar, California 91765, United States.
Michael OgletreeState of Colorado Air Pollution Control Division, Denver, CO 80246-1530, United States.
Christi Chester-SchroederIQAir, La Mirada, California, 90631, United States.
Naomi ZimmermanUniversity of British Columbia, Department of Mechanical Engineering, Vancouver, BC, Canada V6T 1Z4.

Funding

Intramural EPA EPA999999
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Air sensors can provide valuable non-regulatory and supplemental data as they can be affordably deployed in large numbers and stationed in remote areas far away from regulatory air monitoring stations. Air sensors have inherent limitations that are critical to understand before collecting and interpreting the data. Many of these limitations are mechanistic in nature, which will require technological advances. However, there are documented quality assurance (QA) methods to promote data quality. These include laboratory and field evaluation to quantitatively assess performance, the application of corrections to improve precision and accuracy, and active management of the condition or state of health of deployed air quality sensors. This paper summarizes perspectives presented at the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency's 2023 Air Sensors Quality Assurance Workshop (https://www.epa.gov/air-sensor-toolbox/quality-assurance-air-sensors#QAworkshop) by stakeholders (e.g., manufacturers, researchers, air agencies) and identifies the most pressing needs. These include QA protocols, streamlined data processing, improved total volatile organic compound (TVOC) data interpretation, development of speciated VOC sensors, and increased documentation of hardware and data handling. Community members using air sensors need training and resources, timely data, accessible QA approaches, and shared responsibility with other stakeholders. In addition to identifying the vital next steps, this work provides a set of common QA and QC actions aimed at improving and homogenizing air sensor QA that will allow stakeholders with varying fields and levels of expertise to effectively leverage air sensor data to protect human health.

Indexed as

data correctionfenceline monitoringNO2ozonePMquality assurancesensorsVOC

Identifiers

PMID39502563
PMCPMC11534011

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.