ArticleJournal of medical education and curricular development
Development of a Framework of Leadership in Academic Medicine (FLAM).
Article in Journal of medical education and curricular development. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Beyond teaching and research: the hidden economic value of university-affiliated physicians in Italian public hospitals.Updates in surgery · 2026Article
- Leadership in academic medicine: reflections on building departments and shaping culture.International ophthalmology · 2025Article
- Valued Traits of Physician Leaders: A Comparative Study of First-Year and Final-Year Medical Students' Perceptions.Journal of medical education and curricular developmentArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
objectivesLeadership within medical academic institutions often adheres to hierarchical structures, relying on factors like seniority and context, with limited focus on leadership development. This study aims to develop a structured framework by examining the traits, aspirations, and pre-requisites of academic leaders within medical school faculties.
methodsA cross-sectional study collected input from regular medical faculty and those in leadership roles through an online questionnaire, followed by quantitative and qualitative analyses. Data was curated, analyzed, and triangulated to establish subdomains, domains, and themes for the framework.
resultsAmong 229 respondents, 121 held formal academic leadership roles, the remaining 108 were regular medical faculty. And 92% of regular faculty cited lack of experience and training as significant barriers to effective leadership. Both groups agreed on the need for intensive leadership training, as 85% of leaders and 66% of regular faculty lacked formal academic leadership training. The concept of affiliative leadership was favored by 45% of leaders. Qualitative analysis and subtheme triangulation led to the development of the 6 Es Framework for Leadership in Academic Medicine (FLAM). This framework encompasses: ethics (accountability and role modeling), education (structured curriculum and training), envision (clear path and talent identification), engagement (structural foundation and attainable goals), empowerment (fostering passion), and encouragement (financial incentives).
conclusionThis research reinforces the necessity of structured leadership development in academic medicine. The unique attributes of the 6Es FLAM have the potential to enhance leadership in this field.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.