Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502488›Full record

ArticleDigital health

Patients and healthcare practitioners' perspective on the development of a digital interprofessional intervention for COPD.

Natacha Biset, Amélie Rosière, Victoria Lartigue, Stéphanie Pochet, Carine De Vriese

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

Natacha BisetDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0003-3465-4566
Amélie RosièreDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Victoria LartigueDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Stéphanie PochetDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.
Carine De VrieseDepartment of Pharmacotherapy and Pharmaceutics, Faculté de Pharmacie, Université libre de Bruxelles (ULB), Brussels, Belgium.ORCID https://orcid.org/0000-0002-6595-1742

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) patients often have poor health literacy, leading to non-adherence to treatment and poor inhalation technique. Technological solutions can help manage COPD, but adherence tends to be low due to various factors. Objectives and Methods: We conducted a qualitative study to determine the needs of COPD patients and healthcare practitioners (HCPs) towards a mobile application and a web platform. We also aimed to identify potential barriers or facilitators to the use of such digital tools and their potential impact, and to assess the current state of collaboration between healthcare practitioners. Results: Our study found that COPD patients face difficulties in managing the disease and treatments, lack information and need easier contact with caregivers. Patients' needs include access to reliable information about COPD, its medical treatments and smoking cessation, help in maintaining good physical condition through adapted exercises, incentives and reminders, and crisis management protocols or a logbook. As patient needs can differ, it would be ideal if the mobile application could be customized. HCPs cite patient adherence, correct intake of the treatment, communication and lack of patient motivation as challenges. In particular, they would like to have access to information on patient follow-up and logbooks, as well as scientific documentation. They believe that interprofessional collaboration is essential for good patient care. However, lack of time is a major hurdle in optimizing this collaboration. Conclusion: Our study showed that most patients and HCPs view a technological platform positively to support the care of COPD patients and promote interprofessional collaboration.

Indexed as

appsChronicdigital healtheducationpulmonaryqualitativerespiratory

Identifiers

PMID39502488
PMCPMC11536610

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.