ReviewDigital health
Application of privacy protection technology to healthcare big data.
Review in Digital health. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Exploring Technological Solutions for Interoperability Between Patient Electronic Medical Records and Clinical Registries: Scoping Review.Journal of medical Internet research · 2026Article
- Machine Learning-Driven Precision Nutrition: A Paradigm Evolution in Dietary Assessment and Intervention.Nutrients · 2025Review
- Foundation models: Insights and implications for gastrointestinal cancer.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- AI models, bias and data sharing efforts to tackle Alzheimer's disease and related dementias.The journal of prevention of Alzheimer's disease · 2025Article
- Streamlining wearable data integration for EHDS: a case study on advancing healthcare interoperability using Garmin devices and FHIR.Frontiers in digital health · 2025Article
- Article
- Content analysis and optimization suggestions for China's big data on healthcare policy from the perspective of policy tools.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
With the advent of the big data era, data security issues are becoming more common. Healthcare organizations have more data to use for analysis, but they lose money every year due to their inability to prevent data leakage. To overcome these challenges, research on the use of data protection technologies in healthcare is actively underway, particularly research on state-of-the-art technologies, such as federated learning announced by Google and blockchain technology, which has recently attracted attention. To learn about these research efforts, we explored the research, methods, and limitations of the most widely used privacy technologies. After investigating related papers published between 2017 and 2023 and identifying the latest technology trends, we selected related papers and reviewed related technologies. In the process, four technologies were the focus of this study: blockchain, federated learning, isomorphic encryption, and differential privacy. Overall, our analysis provides researchers with insight into privacy technology research by suggesting the limitations of current privacy technologies and suggesting future research directions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.