ArticleJournal of the Endocrine Society2024
Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Autonomously Functioning Thyroid Adenomas-Mayo Clinic Experience.
Article in Journal of the Endocrine Society, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- New gadgets for thyroid ablation-what's the promise?Gland surgery · 2026Article
- Outcomes of Radiofrequency Ablation for Autonomously Functioning Thyroid Adenomas-Mayo Clinic Experience.Journal of the Endocrine Society · 2024Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
9 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Autonomously functioning thyroid nodules (AFTNs) constitute 5% to 7% of thyroid nodules and represent the second most common cause of hyperthyroidism following Graves' disease. Currently, radioactive iodine (RAI) and surgery are the standard treatment options, and both incur a risk of postprocedural hypothyroidism and other surgery and radiation-related complications. Methods: This work aimed at assessing the efficacy of radiofrequency ablation (RFA) as an alternative treatment option for resolving hyperthyroidism and the nodule volume rate reduction (VRR) and its associated adverse events. Results: A total of 22 patients underwent RFA for a solitary AFTN. Seventy-two percent (n = 16) had subclinical hyperthyroidism, 9% (n = 2) had overt hyperthyroidism, and 18% (n = 4) were biochemically euthyroid on antithyroid medication. Average pretreatment TSH was 0.41 mIU/L (SD = 0.98) and free T4 1.29 ng/dL (SD = 0.33). Following a single RFA session, hyperthyroidism resolved in 90.9% (n = 20) and average VRR (61.13%) was achieved within 3 to 6 months following the ablation. Except for 1 nodule, none of the nodules grew during the follow-up period (16.5 months). Two patients (9%) developed transient tachycardia requiring short-term beta-blocker therapy, and 2 developed mild hypothyroidism requiring levothyroxine therapy. Two patients developed recurrent hyperthyroidism and elected to undergo lobectomy and repeat RFA respectively. No serious adverse effects were noted in this cohort. Conclusion: RAI and/or surgery represent the standard of care for toxic adenomas, but RFA shows excellent efficacy and safety profile. Therefore, at centers with RFA expertise, it should be considered an alternative treatment strategy, avoiding radiation and surgery-related complications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.