Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502465›Full record

ArticleImaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.)2024

A novel, robust, and portable platform for magnetoencephalography using optically-pumped magnetometers.

Holly Schofield, Ryan M Hill, Odile Feys, Niall Holmes, James Osborne, Cody Doyle, David Bobela, Pierre Corvilain, Vincent Wens, Lukas Rier and 11 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 14 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
14citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

14 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Review
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Review
  5. Potential ofEpilepsia open · 2025
    Article
  6. SPM-30 years and beyond.Cerebral cortex (New York, N.Y. : 1991) · 2025
    Review
  7. Article
  8. Article
  9. Wearable Magnetoencephalography in a Lightly Shielded Environment.IEEE transactions on bio-medical engineering · 2025
    Article
  10. Determining sensor geometry and gain in a wearable MEG system.Imaging neuroscience (Cambridge, Mass.) · 2025
    Article
  11. Article
  12. Article
  13. Article
  14. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

21 authors.

Holly SchofieldSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Ryan M HillSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Odile FeysUniversité libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Niall HolmesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
James OsborneQuSpin Inc., Louisville, CO, United States.
Cody DoyleQuSpin Inc., Louisville, CO, United States.
David BobelaQuSpin Inc., Louisville, CO, United States.
Pierre CorvilainUniversité libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Vincent WensUniversité libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Lukas RierSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Richard BowtellSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Maxime FerezUniversité libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Karen J MullingerSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Sebastian ColemanSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Natalie RhodesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Molly ReaCerca Magnetics Limited, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Zoe TannerSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Elena BotoSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.
Xavier de TiègeUniversité libre de Bruxelles, ULB Neuroscience Institute, Laboratoire de neuroanatomie et neuroimagerie translationelles, Brussels, Belgium.
Vishal ShahQuSpin Inc., Louisville, CO, United States.
Matthew J BrookesSir Peter Mansfield Imaging Centre, School of Physics and Astronomy, University of Nottingham, University Park, Nottingham, United Kingdom.

Funding

High-resolution Non-cryogenic Magnetoencephalography: Systems-Level IntegrationR44MH110288 · NIMH · QUSPIN · PI SHAH, VISHAL K · 2016 to 2022
$5.1M
Commercialization Readiness of Wearable Optically Pumped MagnetoencephalographySB1MH136846 · NIMH · QUSPIN · PI Vishal K Shah · 2024 to 2026
$3.9M
NIMH NIH HHS R44 MH110288NIMH NIH HHS SB1 MH136846
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Magnetoencephalography (MEG) measures brain function via assessment of magnetic fields generated by neural currents. Conventional MEG uses superconducting sensors, which place significant limitations on performance, practicality, and deployment; however, the field has been revolutionised in recent years by the introduction of optically-pumped magnetometers (OPMs). OPMs enable measurement of the MEG signal without cryogenics, and consequently the conception of "OPM-MEG" systems which ostensibly allow increased sensitivity and resolution, lifespan compliance, free subject movement, and lower cost. However, OPM-MEG is in its infancy with existing limitations on both sensor and system design. Here, we report a new OPM-MEG design with miniaturised and integrated electronic control, a high level of portability, and improved sensor dynamic range. We show that this system produces equivalent measures compared with an established OPM-MEG instrument; specifically, when measuring task-induced beta-band, gamma-band, and evoked neuro-electrical responses, source localisations from the two systems were comparable and temporal correlation of measured brain responses was >0.7 at the individual level and >0.9 for groups. Using an electromagnetic phantom, we demonstrate improved dynamic range by running the system in background fields up to 8 nT. We show that the system is effective in gathering data during free movement (including a sitting-to-standing paradigm) and that it is compatible with simultaneous electroencephalography (EEG). Finally, we demonstrate portability by moving the system between two laboratories. Overall, our new system is shown to be a significant step forward for OPM-MEG and offers an attractive platform for next generation functional medical imaging.

Indexed as

electrophysiologymagnetoencephalographyMEGOPMoptically-pumped magnetometer

Identifiers

PMID39502465
PMCPMC11533384

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.