ReviewBioinformatics and biology insights2024
Approaches for Benchmarking Single-Cell Gene Regulatory Network Methods.
Review in Bioinformatics and biology insights, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Geneformer-guided multiomics integration identifies Pbx1 as a network hub of hematopoietic stem cell aging.Science advances · 2026Article
- SC-MO-GRN-DB: A comprehensive repository for single-cell multiomic gene regulatory networks.iScience · 2026Article
- sRACIPE 2.0: a systems biology circuit modeling toolkit for random circuit perturbation.Bioinformatics (Oxford, England) · 2026Article
- From binding to networks: methods for identifying transcription factor targets in plant systems.Frontiers in plant science · 2026Review
- Artificial Intelligence in Ocular Transcriptomics: Applications of Unsupervised and Supervised Learning.Cells · 2025Review
- Advances in computational and experimental approaches for deciphering transcriptional regulatory networks: Understanding the roles of cis-regulatory elements is essential, and recent research utilizing MPRAs, STARR-seq, CRISPR-Cas9, and machine learning has yielded valuable insights.BioEssays : news and reviews in molecular, cellular and developmental biology · 2024Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
Gene regulatory networks are powerful tools for modeling genetic interactions that control the expression of genes driving cell differentiation, and single-cell sequencing offers a unique opportunity to build these networks with high-resolution genomic data. There are many proposed computational methods to build these networks using single-cell data, and different approaches are used to benchmark these methods. However, a comprehensive discussion specifically focusing on benchmarking approaches is missing. In this article, we lay the GRN terminology, present an overview of common gold-standard studies and data sets, and define the performance metrics for benchmarking network construction methodologies. We also point out the advantages and limitations of different benchmarking approaches, suggest alternative ground truth data sets that can be used for benchmarking, and specify additional considerations in this context.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.