Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502445›Full record

ArticlePhysics and imaging in radiation oncology2024

Automatic segmentation for magnetic resonance imaging guided individual elective lymph node irradiation in head and neck cancer patients.

Floris C J Reinders, Mark H F Savenije, Mischa de Ridder, Matteo Maspero, Patricia A H Doornaert, Chris H J Terhaard, Cornelis P J Raaijmakers, Kaveh Zakeri, Nancy Y Lee, Eric Aliotta and 3 more

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Physics and imaging in radiation oncology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Review
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. MRI-Based Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation Using nnU-Net with 15-Fold Cross-Validation Ensemble.Head and Neck Tumor Segmentation for MR-Guided Applications : First MICCAI Challenge, HNTS-MRG 2024, held in conjunction with MICCAI 2024, Marrakesh, Morocco, October 17, 2024, proceedings · 2025
    Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

13 authors.

Floris C J ReindersDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mark H F SavenijeDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Mischa de RidderDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Matteo MasperoDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Patricia A H DoornaertDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Chris H J TerhaardDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Cornelis P J RaaijmakersDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands.
Kaveh ZakeriDepartment of Radiotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, United States.
Nancy Y LeeDepartment of Radiotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, United States.
Eric AliottaDepartment of Radiotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, United States.
Aneesh RangnekarDepartment of Radiotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, United States.
Harini VeeraraghavanDepartment of Radiotherapy, Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Centre, New York, United States.
Marielle E P PhilippensDepartment of Radiotherapy, University Medical Centre Utrecht, the Netherlands.

Funding

X-RAY CRYSTALLOGRAPHYP30CA008748 · NCI · SLOAN-KETTERING INSTITUTE FOR CANCER RES · PI Hongbiao Carl Lekaye · 1985 to 2026
$347.4M
NCI NIH HHS P30 CA008748
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background and purpose: In head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) patients, the radiation dose to nearby organs at risk can be reduced by restricting elective neck irradiation from lymph node levels to individual lymph nodes. However, manual delineation of every individual lymph node is time-consuming and error prone. Therefore, automatic magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) segmentation of individual lymph nodes was developed and tested using a convolutional neural network (CNN). Materials and methods: In 50 HNSCC patients (UMC-Utrecht), individual lymph nodes located in lymph node levels Ib-II-III-IV-V were manually segmented on MRI by consensus of two experts, obtaining ground truth segmentations. A 3D CNN (nnU-Net) was trained on 40 patients and tested on 10. Evaluation metrics were Dice Similarity Coefficient (DSC), recall, precision, and F1-score. The segmentations of the CNN was compared to segmentations of two observers. Transfer learning was used with 20 additional patients to re-train and test the CNN in another medical center. Results: nnU-Net produced automatic segmentations of elective lymph nodes with median DSC: 0.72, recall: 0.76, precision: 0.78, and F1-score: 0.78. The CNN had higher recall compared to both observers (p = 0.002). No difference in evaluation scores of the networks in both medical centers was found after re-training with 5 or 10 patients. Conclusion: nnU-Net was able to automatically segment individual lymph nodes on MRI. The detection rate of lymph nodes using nnU-Net was higher than manual segmentations. Re-training nnU-Net was required to successfully transfer the network to the other medical center.

Indexed as

Artificial intelligenceDeep learningElective neck irradiationLymph nodesMagnetic resonance imagingRadiotherapySquamous cell carcinoma of head and neck

Identifiers

PMID39502445
PMCPMC11536060

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.