ArticleInternational journal of health sciences
The usefulness of B-cell lymphoma-2 immunohistochemical stain in the differentiation between reactive atypia and dysplasia/carcinoma in the gallbladder.
Article in International journal of health sciences. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Objective: The differentiation between reactive atypical changes and dysplasia/carcinoma in the daily cases of cholecystectomies is a routine histopathological challenge. Up to our knowledge, no immunohistochemical marker can definitely differentiate between these two changes. Many promising markers have been proposed to be helpful tools in this situation. One of them is B-cell lymphoma-2 (BCL-2) immunohistochemical stain. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate its usefulness as a marker that might be helpful in such challenging cases. Methods: From the archive of the histopathology laboratories of Qassim University Medical City and King Fahad Specialist Hospital in Qassim, five dysplastic/neoplastic gallbladder cases were collected (in the shape of formalin-fixed, paraffin-embedded blocks) as well as five cholecystitis with reactive atypical changes cases. Two slides from each block were prepared: One was stained with H&E and the other was stained immunohistochemically with BCL-2. The slides were evaluated by two histopathologist consultants in the same sitting using multiheaded microscope to confirm the original diagnosis and to evaluate the BCL-2 staining. Results: Five dysplastic/carcinoma cases and five cholecystitis with reactive atypia were collected. The original diagnoses were confirmed by two pathologists. They also confirmed that all the BCL-2 stained slides (with the exception of one reactive case) were negative for BCL-2 immunohistochemical stain. Conclusion: BCL-2 immunohistochemical stain is not a promising marker in the differentiation between reactive epithelium and dysplasia/carcinoma in the gallbladder.
Indexed as
Identifiers
39502427PMC11533188What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.