ArticleOrthopaedic journal of sports medicine2024
Time Required to Achieve Clinically Significant Outcomes After Anteroinferior Arthroscopic Capsular Release for Shoulder Adhesive Capsulitis.
Article in Orthopaedic journal of sports medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development of a Multidomain Conceptual Framework for Frozen Shoulder: A Systematic Review Integrating Clinical, Biological, Psychological and Lifestyle-Related Contributors.Journal of clinical medicine · 2026Review
- Effect of beach chair position on hemodynamics and cardiovascular events in patients undergoing shoulder arthroscopy for rotator cuff injury combined with shoulder adhesion.Frontiers in surgery · 2026Article
- CORR Insights®: Releasing Forces in Adhesive Capsulitis Are Important Indicators of Shoulder Stiffness and Postoperative Function.Clinical orthopaedics and related research · 2025Article
- Short-term clinical efficacy of five-step manipulation under anaesthesia combined with arthroscopic shoulder surgery for adhesive capsulitis.Frontiers in surgery · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: The specific time required to reach clinically significant outcomes for patient-reported outcome measures (PROMs) after arthroscopic capsular release (ACR) for the treatment of shoulder adhesive capsulitis remains unknown. Purposes: To determine the time required to achieve the minimal clinically important difference (MCID) and Patient Acceptable Symptom State (PASS) score thresholds after ACR for visual analog scale (VAS) for pain, American Shoulder and Elbow Surgeons score (ASES), Single Assessment Numeric Evaluation (SANE), and Constant score and to identify patient factors associated with delayed achievement of these clinical benchmarks. Study Design: Case series; Level of evidence, 4. Methods: A prospective analysis was performed of patients who underwent ACR for the treatment of idiopathic shoulder adhesive capsulitis between October 2019 and October2020. Patients completed PROMs preoperatively and at 1, 2, 4, 6, and 12 months postoperatively. Threshold values for MCID and PASS were obtained from previous literature for the VAS, ASES, SANE, and Constant scores. Results: A total of 73 patients were included (mean age, 55.5 ± 9.3 years; body mass index [BMI], 26.6 ± 4.6 kg/m Conclusion: Most patients undergoing ACR achieved clinically significant outcomes within a 4-month timeframe. The majority of patients reached MCID thresholds on outcome measures within 1 to 2 months and achieved satisfactory symptom states within 2 to 4 months postoperatively. By delineating the timeline of patient-perceived benefits, these results provide useful data to set appropriate expectations, guide rehabilitation, and optimize outcomes after ACR.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.