ReviewiScience2024
Nanomaterials for stroke diagnosis and treatment.
Review in iScience, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Prospects of DNA nanotechnology in stroke repair and regeneration.Communications biology · 2026Review
- Deep self-attention reinforcement learning adaptive gait planning and control for lower limb rehabilitation exoskeletons robot.iScience · 2026Article
- Macrophage immunometabolism in stroke: a view from single-cell and nano technologies.Journal of translational medicine · 2026Review
- Magnetic particle clusters with tunable thrombus penetration for enhanced thrombolysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2026Article
- Cell Membrane- and Vesicle-Based Bionic Nanodrugs: Applications in Central Nervous System Diseases and Exploration of Nasal-Cerebral Delivery.Gels (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
- SynBioNanoDesign: pioneering targeted drug delivery with engineered nanomaterials.Journal of nanobiotechnology · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
11 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Nanomaterials and nanotechnology innovations possess unique physicochemical properties that present new opportunities in the realm of stroke detection, diagnosis, and treatment. This comprehensive review explores the utilization of nanomaterials in the diagnosis and treatment of strokes, encompassing recent advancements in computed tomography (CT), magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic particle imaging (MPI), as well as groundbreaking applications of nanomaterials and bionanomaterials in drug delivery systems and brain tissue repair. Additionally, this review meticulously examines significant challenges such as biocompatibility toxicity and long-term safety, proposing potential strategies to surmount these obstacles. Moreover, this review delves into the application of nanomaterials to improve the clinical diagnosis of stroke patients, elucidates the potential of nanotechnology in post-stroke therapy, and identifies future research directions and potential clinical applications.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.