ArticleHeliyon2024
Comparison of the effects of nursing and peer education on quality of life and resilience in patients with multiple sclerosis: A randomized clinical trial.
Article in Heliyon, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
2 citing papers in PubMed.
- Effectiveness of a self-management educational program among people with multiple sclerosis: a pre-test post-test intervention study.The Journal of the Egyptian Public Health Association · 2026Article
- The effect of peer-led education on the quality of life of mothers of premature infants in neonatal intensive care units: a quasi-experimental study.BMC research notes · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Background: Multiple sclerosis (MS) is a prevalent disease of the central nervous system that often leads to diminished resilience and quality of life in affected individuals. This study aims to compare the effects of nursing and peer education on improving the quality of life and resilience in patients with multiple sclerosis. Materials and methods: This three-group clinical trial study was conducted before and after interventions at the MS Society in Hamedan, Iran. In this study, 120 patients with MS were randomly selected and assigned to three groups: nurse education, peer education, and control. Quality of life and resilience questionnaires were self-reported before and two months after the completion of the intervention. The educational sessions were conducted over five meetings, each lasting between 45 and 60 min, held every two days. Group one received education led by nurses, while group two participated in peer-led education sessions. Results: The results indicated that before the intervention, there were no significant statistical differences in demographic variables, resilience, and quality of life among the three groups (p > 0.05). However, after the intervention, both the peer and nurse groups showed a significant increase in quality of life and resilience compared to the control group (p < 0.05). Nevertheless, no differences were observed between the nurse and peer groups regarding these variables (p > 0.05). Conclusions: Both nursing and peer education methods had an equal impact on enhancing the resilience and quality of life of patients with MS. It is recommended that peer support be utilized to empower MS patients, especially in contexts where there is a shortage of nurses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.