Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502156›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

When end of treatment situations challenge patient-centered care: a discussion paper proposing new theoretical insights.

Federica Bonazza, Giulia Lamiani, Lidia Borghi, Silvia Del Negro, Daniela Leone, Elena Vegni

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Federica BonazzaDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Giulia LamianiDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.
Lidia BorghiUnit of Clinical Psychology, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Silvia Del NegroUnit of Clinical Psychology, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Daniela LeoneUnit of Clinical Psychology, San Paolo Hospital, ASST Santi Paolo e Carlo, Milan, Italy.
Elena VegniDepartment of Health Sciences, University of Milan, Milan, Italy.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: According to the Institute of Medicine patient-centered medicine is one of the six crucial dimensions of health care quality. Although the patient-centered care model is widely recognized for its ethical underpinnings and effectiveness, its practical implementation still raises challenges, especially in end-of-treatment situations. This discussion paper offers an overview of the challenges facing the physician-patient relationship in end-of-treatment situations. Methods: We developed three clinical vignettes and made some theoretical considerations about ethical issues related to the decision-making process leading to the end of treatment. Results: We identified two main challenges that end-of-treatment situations pose to patient-centered care: (1) when the patient's autonomy challenges the best clinical treatment; and (2) when the proposed treatment (discontinuation of treatment) challenges the patient's preferences. Discussions: Patient-centered care supports personalized decision-making, in which the physician's approach varies according to the patient's situation and individuality. The idea of beneficence may change during care, because of acceptance of the patient's principles or a change in the primary goal of care.

Indexed as

decision-making processend-of-treatmentpatient-centered medicinephysician-patient relationshipshared decision-making

Identifiers

PMID39502156
PMCPMC11536371

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.