Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502151›Full record

ArticleFrontiers in psychology2024

Emotion regulation use in daily-life and its association with success of emotion-regulation, self-efficacy, stress, and state rumination.

Isabell Int-Veen, Magdalena Volz, Agnes Kroczek, Andreas J Fallgatter, Ann-Christine Ehlis, Julian A Rubel, David Rosenbaum

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Frontiers in psychology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Isabell Int-VeenDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Magdalena VolzPsychotherapy Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Osnabrueck University, Osnabrueck, Germany.
Agnes KroczekDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Andreas J FallgatterDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Ann-Christine EhlisDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.
Julian A RubelPsychotherapy Research Unit, Department of Psychology, Osnabrueck University, Osnabrueck, Germany.
David RosenbaumDepartment of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Tübingen Center for Mental Health (TüCMH), University Hospital of Tübingen, Tübingen, Germany.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Introduction: Investigations on emotion regulation strategies (ERS) primarily focus on the influence of instructed emotion regulation (ER) on outcomes. However, recent work has shown that selection of ERS is dependent on, e.g., situational demands and personal resources. Methods: In this current investigation, we used an online diary to investigate ERS used by free choice and their association with ER-success, stress and rumination. We identified four factors of ERS: cognitive perspective change, cognitive-behavioral problem-solving, suppression-distraction and body-social ERS. Associations of ERS with stress, state-rumination and ER-success were investigated using multilevel-mixed-models, allowing to separate within- and between-subject effects. Results: Our results show that, on a within-subject level, all adaptive ERS were positively associated with ER-success, while maladaptive ERS as well as higher stress and state rumination were negatively associated with ER-success. On the other hand, only within-subject cognitive ERS were associated with higher self-efficacy. Maladaptive ERS-use was consequently positively associated with stress and state rumination. Surprisingly, only cognitive perspective change ERS were negatively associated with state rumination. Cognitive-behavioral problem-solving was positively associated with stress and success of emotion regulation. Discussion: We interpret these results in the light of situational constraints of ERS-use and the importance of the assessment of these in future studies.

Indexed as

daily diaryecological momentary assessmentemotion regulationruminationstress

Identifiers

PMID39502151
PMCPMC11534797

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.