Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39502098›Full record

ArticleCanadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique2024

Use and impact of virtual resources for peer support by young adults living with cancer: A systematic review.

Riley Martens, Mary Hou, Susan Isherwood, Alison Hunter-Smith, May-Lynn Quan, Colleen Cuthbert

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
5citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

5 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Trial
  2. Toward Better Conversations: Assessing Caregiver-Child Communication in Pediatric Oncology.Supportive care in cancer : official journal of the Multinational Association of Supportive Care in Cancer · 2026
    Article
  3. Review
  4. Use and impact of virtual resources for peer support by young adults living with cancer: A systematic review.Canadian oncology nursing journal = Revue canadienne de nursing oncologique · 2024
    Article
  5. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

6 authors.

Riley MartensFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary.
Mary HouCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary.
Susan IsherwoodCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary.
Alison Hunter-SmithSt. Helen's & Knowsley Teaching Hospitals NHS Trust, Liverpool, United Kingdom.
May-Lynn QuanCumming School of Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary.
Colleen CuthbertFaculty of Nursing, University of Calgary, Calgary.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Background: Young adults (YA) with cancer often have unmet psychosocial needs. The impact of peer support delivered in an online format to fulfil these needs in the populations of YA with cancer has not been thoroughly examined. Methods: We searched Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials, CINAHL, Embase, and Medline databases. We included articles about online peer support interventions for YA cancer survivors between the ages of 18 to 40 years old. Results: Our literature search yielded n = 2,773 articles and we obtained consensus on 12 articles for inclusion. We qualitatively synthesized these articles using data abstraction based on the Template for Intervention and Replication (TIDierR) checklist. Overall, six studies demonstrated correlation between online peer support and improved wellbeing of participants. Thus, online peer support may be useful for young cancer patients. Conclusion: This systematic review summarizes the current state of knowledge regarding the availability and evaluation of online YA peer support programs and reveals the need for further research in this field.

Indexed as

cancer survivorinternet-based interventionsocial mediasocial supportsocial survivorshipyoung adult

Identifiers

PMID39502098
PMCPMC11534361

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.