Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39501982›Full record

ArticleApplied neuropsychology. Adult

Introduction and preliminary psychometric evaluation of the assessment of functional capacity interview for older adults.

Nicole Sergeyev, Nadia Paré, Aneela Rahman, Anjali Krishnan, David E Warren, Trevor Wolterstoff, Anna Wilhelm, Erica Aflagah, Laura Rabin

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Applied neuropsychology. Adult. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

9 authors.

Nicole SergeyevDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Nadia ParéGaylord Specialty Hospital, Wallingford, CT, USA.
Aneela RahmanDepartment of Psychology, Queens College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
Anjali KrishnanDepartment of Psychology, Brooklyn College, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.
David E WarrenDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Trevor WolterstoffDepartment of Psychiatry, University of South Dakota Sanford School of Medicine, Sioux Falls, SD, USA.
Anna WilhelmDepartment of Neurological Sciences, University of Nebraska Medical Center, Omaha, NE, USA.
Erica AflagahDepartment of Geriatric Medicine, Neuropsychology, Nebraska Methodist Health System, Omaha, NE, USA.
Laura RabinDepartment of Psychology, The Graduate Center, City University of New York, New York, NY, USA.

Funding

Translational Imaging and Behavioral Assessment (TIBA) CoreP20GM130447 · NIGMS · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI Anna Dunaevsky · 2020 to 2026
$20.7M
Measuring neurodevelopmental effects of polygenic risk for Alzheimer's disease via longitudinal study of brain and cognitive variables in periadolescent childrenR01AG064247 · NIA · UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA MEDICAL CENTER · PI WARREN, DAVID E · 2019 to 2023
$3.0M
Novel Multimodal Assessment of Practical Judgment Across the Alzheimer's Continuum: Toward a Better Understanding of how to Predict Risk in the ElderlyR15AG066039 · NIA · BROOKLYN COLLEGE · PI RABIN, LAURA A. · 2020 to 2023
$522k
NIA NIH HHS R01 AG064247NIA NIH HHS R15 AG066039NIGMS NIH HHS P20 GM130447
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Measures of complex functional decision-making capacity can greatly aid in assessing mild cognitive impairment (MCI) and facilitating early intervention in dementia care. We examined the ability of the Assessment of Functional Capacity Interview (AFCI) to detect functional differences among older adults who were cognitively unimpaired (CU), or who presented with subjective cognitive decline (SCD) or MCI. A sample of 97 older adults (CU; n = 30, Mage = 74.64 ± 7.42 years; SCD; n = 34, Mage = 72.56 ± 6.43 years; MCI; n = 33, Mage = 78.28 ± 7.55 years) underwent neuropsychological testing and responded to the Financial Capacity Instrument (FCI-SF). Informants completed the Assessment of Functional Capacity (AFCI), an instrument of functional decision-making capacity, and responded to the Social Vulnerability Scale (SVS15) and Amsterdam Instrumental Activity of Daily Living (A-IADL-Q-SV), a measure of functional status, for comparison. According to informant-reported responses, the CU group had significantly lower AFCI total (and domain) scores,

Indexed as

Activities of Daily LivingAgingCognitive DysfunctionDecision MakingGeriatric AssessmentInterview, PsychologicalNeuropsychological TestsPsychometricsAgedAged, 80 and overFemaleHumansMaleAgingcognitionfunctional decision-making capacitysocial vulnerability

Identifiers

PMID39501982
PMCPMC12053505

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.