Observational studyAfrican journal of primary health care & family medicine2024
Doctors' knowledge, attitudes and practices of palliative care in two South African districts.
Observational study in African journal of primary health care & family medicine, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- Healthcare professionals' conceptualizations of palliative care and readiness for early integration: a cross‑sectional mixed‑methods survey in Finland.BMC palliative care · 2026Article
- Regional anaesthesia in the emergency centre: Knowledge, attitudes and practices of doctors in the Western Cape, South Africa.South African family practice : official journal of the South African Academy of Family Practice/Primary Care · 2025Article
- A qualitative study of differences in palliative care in hospitals and traditional home-based care in Cameroon.BMC palliative care · 2025Article
- Integrating emergency medical services and palliative care: A nominal group technique.African journal of primary health care & family medicine · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
3 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundIn South Africa, most palliative care takes place in health districts as part of home-based care provided by nongovernment organisations (NGOs). The National Policy Framework and Strategy on Palliative Care (NPFSPC) aims to ensure adequate numbers of palliative care trained healthcare workers. Guidelines and tools such as the Supportive and Palliative Care Indicators Tool (SPICT) assist in identifying and caring for patients needing palliative care.
aimTo evaluate the knowledge, attitudes and practices of public sector doctors to provide palliative care in the Garden Route and Central Karoo Districts.
settingThe study was conducted at public sector district-level hospitals.
methodsA descriptive observational cross-sectional survey was conducted. The study population included all public sector district-level doctors. Participation was voluntary, and 73 responses (60%) were obtained. Data were collected with an online questionnaire using the adapted 'Knowledge Attitudes Practice' model. Quantitative data were imported into the Statistical Package for Social Sciences for analysis.
resultsParticipants had poor knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding palliative care. There was a statistically significant difference between the knowledge of junior doctors and senior doctors, with 78% of junior doctors having inadequate palliative care knowledge. Only 25% of respondents had received formal postgraduate palliative care training. Seventy (96%) participants reported that home was the best care setting for terminally ill patients.
conclusionDoctors in the Garden Route and Central Karoo need further training to meet the NPFSPC standards.Contribution: This study adds to the palliative care field, highlighting the need for ongoing training of doctors.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.