Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39501482›Full record

Observational studyInternational journal of cancer2025

Nivolumab in patients with recurrent or metastatic squamous cell carcinoma of the head and neck: Results of Polish multicenter observational study.

Tomasz Wojciech Rutkowski, Agata Kurczyk, Katarzyna Drosik-Rutowicz, Dorota Kiprian, Izabella Dębicka, Ewa Sierko, Monika Konopka-Filippow, Joanna Kaźmierska, Monika Łukasiewicz-Grella, Diana Cząstkiewicz-Trawińska and 12 more

Abstract readObservational StudyMulticenter Study
In one paragraph

Observational study in International journal of cancer, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 2 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
2citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

2 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Observational
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

22 authors.

Tomasz Wojciech RutkowskiRadiation and Clinical Oncology Department and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0003-2735-5664
Agata KurczykRadiation and Clinical Oncology Department and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.ORCID 0000-0002-4124-9385
Katarzyna Drosik-RutowiczRadiation and Clinical Oncology Department and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Dorota KiprianRadiotherapy Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Warsaw, Poland.
Izabella DębickaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, Lower Silesian Oncology, Pulmonology and Hematology Center, Wrocław, Poland.
Ewa SierkoDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Maria-Sklodowska-Curie Oncology Center, Bialystok, Poland.
Monika Konopka-FilippowDepartment of Radiation Therapy, Maria-Sklodowska-Curie Oncology Center, Bialystok, Poland.
Joanna KaźmierskaGreater Poland Cancer Center, Department of Electroradiology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Monika Łukasiewicz-GrellaGreater Poland Cancer Center, Department of Electroradiology, University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Diana Cząstkiewicz-TrawińskaClinical Oncology Department, University Hospital, Zielona Góra, Poland.
Izolda Mrochem-DominDepartment of Oncology, Center of Oncology, Katowice, Poland.
Iwona Ryniewicz-ZanderDepartment of Oncology, Hospital in Elbląg, Elbląg, Poland.
Zuzanna BorysiewiczDepartment of Oncology, Hospital in Elbląg, Elbląg, Poland.
Ewa ChmielowskaDepartment of Oncology, Specialistic Oncologic Hospital, Tomaszów Mazowiecki, Poland.
Marek JasiówkaClinical Oncology Department, Rydygier Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Monika Źrebiec-FiguraClinical Oncology Department, Rydygier Hospital, Kraków, Poland.
Agnieszka KarpińskaDepartment of Clinical Oncology, West Pomeranian Center of Oncology, Szczecin, Poland.
Renata Pacholczak-MadejClinical Oncology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow, Poland.
Dominika LeśRadiation and Clinical Oncology Department and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.
Agnieszka PietruszkaClinical Oncology Department, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Cracow, Poland.
Izabela ŁasinskaDepartment of Medical and Experimental Oncology, Institute of Oncology, Poznań University of Medical Sciences, Poznań, Poland.
Krzysztof SkładowskiRadiation and Clinical Oncology Department and Department of Biostatistics and Bioinformatics, Maria Sklodowska-Curie National Research Institute of Oncology, Gliwice, Poland.

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Patients with head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) who have progressed following primary treatment (PT) have a poor prognosis. In this group, nivolumab has been demonstrated to significantly improve outcomes. This study presents the efficacy of nivolumab in Polish patients with recurrent and/or metastatic (R/M) HNSCC using real-world data. The analyzed group consisted of 324 adult patients with R/M HNSCC following platinum-based therapy. Patients were divided into 3 groups based on the time from completion of PT to nivolumab initiation (tPT-N): within 6 months (refractory), between 6 and 24 months (sensitive, tPT-N ≤24), and beyond 24 months (sensitive, tPT-N >24). Survival analysis and the Cox proportional hazards model were performed to evaluate how various risk factors affect patient outcomes. The 1-year and 2-year overall survival (OS) was 19.1%, 6.1%, 30.7%, 9.4%, and 45.7%, 29.1% in refractory, sensitive tPT-N ≤24, sensitive tPT-N >24 patients, respectively and was higher for both sensitivity groups vs. refractory (p = .004) and for sensitive tPT-N >24 versus refractory and sensitive tPT-N ≤24 (p <.001). Patients with nasopharyngeal cancer had OS significantly higher than patients with other primary tumor localization. The multivariate Cox analysis showed a significant favorable effect of tPT-N >24 (HR = 0.53, p = .001) and nasopharyngeal cancer on OS (HR = 0.20, p = .008). Conversely, female sex was identified as an unfavorable factor for OS (HR = 1.48, p = .020). In our study, we established that the benefit of nivolumab increases with the increasing tPT-N. The probability of death is significantly lower in male patients and patients with nasopharyngeal cancer regardless of tPT-N.

Indexed as

Head and Neck NeoplasmsNeoplasm Recurrence, LocalNivolumabSquamous Cell Carcinoma of Head and NeckAdultAgedAged, 80 and overAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalFemaleHumansMaleMiddle AgedNeoplasm MetastasisPolandPrognosisRetrospective StudiesAntineoplastic Agents, ImmunologicalNivolumabimmunotherapynivolumabrecurrent or metastatic head and neck cancer

Identifiers

PMID39501482
PMCPMC11701412

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.