ArticleActa oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden)2024
The impact of age on clinicopathological features and treatment results in patients with localised prostate cancer receiving definitive radiotherapy.
Article in Acta oncologica (Stockholm, Sweden), 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long term outcomes of prostate cancer patients aged 55 years or younger treated with definitive radiotherapy: Trod 09-005 study.Strahlentherapie und Onkologie : Organ der Deutschen Rontgengesellschaft ... [et al] · 2026Article
- Carbon-Ion Radiotherapy for Prostate Cancer in Patients with a History of Surgery for Benign Prostatic Hyperplasia.Cancers · 2025Article
- Predictive Factors for Gastrointestinal and Genitourinary Toxicities in Prostate Cancer External Beam Radiotherapy: A Scoping Review.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundThis study assessed the biochemical disease-free survival (bDFS), prostate cancer-specific survival (PCSS), overall survival (OS), and side effects in patients aged < 70 and ≥ 70 years following definitive radiotherapy (RT). It also analysed the correlation between age at diagnosis and clinicopathological characteristics of prostate cancer (PCa).
methodsThe prognostic factors for bDFS, PCSS, and OS were determined through univariable and multivariable analyses. Two age groups were also compared in terms of acute and late grade ≥ 2 genitourinary (GU) and gastrointestinal (GI) toxicities, the predictors of which were determined through logistic regression analysis.
resultsOf the 1,328 patients, 715 (53.8%) and 613 (46.2%) were aged < 70 and ≥ 70 years, respectively. Median follow-up time was 84.5 months. No significant differences in the 7-year bDFS (86.3% vs. 86.8%) and PCSS rates (92.9% vs. 93.3%) were found between the ≥ 70 and < 70 age groups. The multivariable analysis showed that advanced clinical T stage, high International Society of Urological Pathology (ISUP) grade, and high-risk disease independently predicted poor bDFS and PCSS. Metastatic lymph nodes were another bDFS prognostic factor. The multivariable analysis identified age ≥ 70 years, cardiac events at diagnosis, advanced stage, higher ISUP grade, and non-use of simultaneous integrated boost technique as negative factors for OS. Additionally, diabetes and transurethral resection of the prostate (TUR-P) independently predict late-grade ≥ 2 GU toxicity.
interpretationDefinitive RT is a safe and effective treatment for patients with localised PCa no matter their age. Although patients over 70 years have higher risk factors and comorbidities, their bDFS, PCSS, and toxicities were comparable to those of patients aged < 70 years.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.