ReviewHuman genomics2024
Best practices for germline variant and DNA methylation analysis of second- and third-generation sequencing data.
Review in Human genomics, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
6 citing papers in PubMed.
- Long-range PCR and Nanopore sequencing for localisation and phasing variants: an end-to-end clinical application workflow.BMC medical genomics · 2025Article
- Article
- fastp 1.0: An ultra-fast all-round tool for FASTQ data quality control and preprocessing.iMeta · 2025Article
- Association of TRDMT1 Gene Polymorphisms With Neuroblastoma Susceptibility: Insights From a Case-Control Study.Journal of cellular and molecular medicine · 2025Article
- The Diagnostic Value of Copy Number Variants in Genetic Cardiomyopathies and Channelopathies.Journal of cardiovascular development and disease · 2025Review
- Functional genomic analysis ofCurrent research in microbial sciences · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
17 authors.
Funding
Abstract
This comprehensive review provides insights and suggested strategies for the analysis of germline variants using second- and third-generation sequencing technologies (SGS and TGS). It addresses the critical stages of data processing, starting from alignment and preprocessing to quality control, variant calling, and the removal of artifacts. The document emphasized the importance of meticulous data handling, highlighting advanced methodologies for annotating variants and identifying structural variations and methylated DNA sites. Special attention is given to the inspection of problematic variants, a step that is crucial for ensuring the accuracy of the analysis, particularly in clinical settings where genetic diagnostics can inform patient care. Additionally, the document covers the use of various bioinformatics tools and software that enhance the precision and reliability of these analyses. It outlines best practices for the annotation of variants, including considerations for problematic genetic alterations such as those in the human leukocyte antigen region, runs of homozygosity, and mitochondrial DNA alterations. The document also explores the complexities associated with identifying structural variants and copy number variations, underscoring the challenges posed by these large-scale genomic alterations. The objective is to offer a comprehensive framework for researchers and clinicians, ensuring that genetic analyses conducted with SGS and TGS are both accurate and reproducible. By following these best practices, the document aims to increase the diagnostic accuracy for hereditary diseases, facilitating early diagnosis, prevention, and personalized treatment strategies. This review serves as a valuable resource for both novices and experts in the field, providing insights into the latest advancements and methodologies in genetic analysis. It also aims to encourage the adoption of these practices in diverse research and clinical contexts, promoting consistency and reliability across studies.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.