ArticleParasites & vectors2024
A lightweight deep-learning model for parasite egg detection in microscopy images.
Article in Parasites & vectors, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Deep learning applications in parasite microscopy: A scoping review.PLoS neglected tropical diseases · 2026Article
- Artifact-Aware Fungal Detection in Dermatophytosis: A Transformer-Based Approach for KOH Microscopy.Bioengineering (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Article
- Intelligent identification of medical and veterinary intracellular protozoa by using self-supervised learning.Parasites & vectors · 2026Article
- Deep learning-based no-reference image quality assessment framework for Cryptosporidium spp. and Giardia spp.PloS one · 2026Article
- Precise detection of Eimeria oocysts in sheep: a deep learning model based on microscopic images.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Performance validation of deep-learning-based approach in stool examination.Parasites & vectors · 2025Article
- Automated detection of pinworm parasite eggs using YOLO convolutional block attention module for enhanced microscopic image analysis.Frontiers in bioengineering and biotechnology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundIntestinal parasitic infections are still a serious public health problem in developing countries, and the diagnosis of parasitic infections requires the first step of parasite/egg detection of samples. Automated detection can eliminate the dependence on professionals, but the current detection algorithms require large computational resources, which increases the lower limit of automated detection. Therefore, we have designed a lightweight deep-learning model, YAC-Net, to achieve rapid and accurate detection of parasitic eggs and reduce the cost of automation.
methodsThis paper uses the ICIP 2022 Challenge dataset for experiments, and the experiments are conducted using fivefold cross-validation. The YOLOv5n model is used as the baseline model, and then two improvements are made to the baseline model based on the specificity of the egg data. First, the neck of the YOLOv5n is modified to from a feature pyramid network (FPN) to an asymptotic feature pyramid network (AFPN) structure. Different from the FPN structure, which mainly integrates semantic feature information at adjacent levels, the hierarchical and asymptotic aggregation structure of AFPN can fully fuse the spatial contextual information of egg images, and its adaptive spatial feature fusion mode can help the model select beneficial feature and ignore redundant information, thereby reducing computational complexity and improving detection performance. Second, the C3 module of the backbone of the YOLOv5n is modified to a C2f module, which can enrich gradient information, improving the feature extraction capability of the backbone. Moreover, ablation studies are designed by us to verify the effectiveness of the AFPN and C2f modules in the process of model lightweighting.
resultsThe experimental results show that compared with YOLOv5n, YAC-Net improves precision by 1.1%, recall by 2.8%, the F1 score by 0.0195, and mAP_0.5 by 0.0271 and reduces the parameters by one-fifth. Compared with some state-of-the-art detection methods, YAC-Net achieves the best performance in precision, F1 score, mAP_0.5, and parameters. The precision, recall, F1 score, mAP_0.5, and parameters of our method on the test set are 97.8%, 97.7%, 0.9773, 0.9913, and 1,924,302, respectively.
conclusionsCompared with the baseline model, YAC-Net optimizes the model structure and simplifies the parameters while ensuring the detection performance. It helps to reduce the equipment requirements for performing automated detection and can be used to realize the automatic detection of parasite eggs under microscope images.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.