Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39501272›Full record

ReviewOrphanet journal of rare diseases2024

PHARC syndrome: an overview.

Lusine Harutyunyan, Patrick Callaerts, Sascha Vermeer

Erratum issuedAbstract readReview
In one paragraph

Review in Orphanet journal of rare diseases, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. An erratum has been issued. Cited by 4 papers.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
4citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

4 citing papers in PubMed.

  1. Article
  2. Article
  3. Correction to: PHARC syndrome: an overview.Orphanet journal of rare diseases · 2025
    Article
  4. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

3 authors.

Lusine HarutyunyanLaboratory for Behavioral and Developmental Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Patrick CallaertsLaboratory for Behavioral and Developmental Genetics, Department of Human Genetics, KU Leuven, Louvain, Belgium.
Sascha VermeerCentre of Human Genetics, University Hospitals Leuven, Herestraat 49, 3000, Louvain, Belgium. sascha.vermeer@uzleuven.be.ORCID 0000-0001-7625-1912

Funding

No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.

6 · The paper itself

Abstract

PHARC, polyneuropathy, hearing loss, cerebellar ataxia, retinitis pigmentosa and cataracts, or PHARC is a very rare progressive neurodegenerative autosomal recessive disease caused by biallelic mutations in the ABHD12 (a/b-hydrolase domain containing 12) gene, which encodes a lyso-phosphatidylserine (lyso-PS) lipase. The Orpha number for PHARC is ORPHA171848. The clinical picture of PHARC syndrome is very heterogeneous with a wide range of age at onset for each symptom, making a clinical diagnosis very challenging. Differential diagnoses of the disease include Refsum disease, Charcot-Marie-Tooth disease, and Usher syndrome. Many aspects of the disease, such as the biochemistry and pathophysiology, are still not fully understood. We generated a clinical overview of all PHARC patients, including their mutations, described in literature so far. Furthermore, we give an outline of the most recent developments in research on the pathophysiology of PHARC syndrome in an attempt to gain more insight into and increase awareness of the heterogeneity of the disease. We included 58 patients with PHARC from 37 different families with 27 known ABHD12 mutations. The age at onset (from early childhood to late thirties) and the severity of each feature of PHARC varied widely among patients. Demyelinating polyneuropathy was reported in 91% of the patients. In 86% of patients, hearing loss was present and 74% had cerebellar ataxia, the most variable symptom of PHARC. Retinitis pigmentosa and cataracts occurred in 82% and 86% of patients, respectively. Due to the rareness of the disease and the variable clinical phenotype, a diagnosis of PHARC is often delayed and mostly only made after an extensive genetic work-up. Therefore, we recommend adding the ABHD12 gene to diagnostic gene panels for polyneuropathy, cerebellar ataxia, hearing loss, retinal dystrophy, and cataracts. In addition, a full clinical work-up, neurological (with EMG and neuroimaging of the brain) and ophthalmological (with ERG) examination and audiological tests are indispensable to obtain a comprehensive overview of the clinical phenotype as some symptoms in PHARC may be very subtle and easily overlooked if not tested for. In conclusion, we strongly recommend that patients with (suspected) PHARC should be evaluated in a multidisciplinary setting involving ophthalmologists, audiologists, neurologists, and geneticists to ensure the best possible care. Furthermore, we discuss whether PHARC is a spectrum with various incomplete phenotypes even later in life, or whether it is a syndrome in which the clinical symptoms are variable in severity and age of onset.

Indexed as

CataractPolyneuropathiesRetinitis PigmentosaAtaxiaCerebellar AtaxiaHearing LossHumansMonoacylglycerol LipasesMutationABHD12 protein, humanMonoacylglycerol LipasesCataractCerebellar ataxiaHearing lossPHARCPolyneuropathyRetinitis pigmentosaSystematic review

Identifiers

PMID39501272
PMCPMC11539745

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.