ArticleBMC medical informatics and decision making2024
Interpretable prediction of 30-day mortality in patients with acute pancreatitis based on machine learning and SHAP.
Article in BMC medical informatics and decision making, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 10 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
10 citing papers in PubMed.
- Machine learning-based prediction and external validation of treatment-related myelosuppression in patients with non-small cell lung cancer receiving PD-1 inhibitors plus platinum-doublet chemotherapy.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- An interpretable early intensive care unit model for predicting in-hospital mortality in trauma patients combined with rib fractures: development and external validation.Journal of thoracic disease · 2026Article
- Management and Prediction of Acute Pancreatitis Severity Using AI: A Surgical Perspective.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Development and external validation of a machine learning model for predicting chronic critical illness in ICU patients with acute pancreatitis.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Machine learning for dysphagia risk prediction in older adults after acute ischemic stroke.BMC medical informatics and decision making · 2026Article
- Article
- Machine learning model for predicting hospital-acquired functional decline in older patients with postoperative cardiovascular surgery.World journal of clinical cases · 2026Article
- Research integrity and data ethics in AI-driven integrated healthcare: a critical appraisal.Frontiers in public health · 2026Review
- Artificial intelligence in pancreatitis: A narrative review on advancing precision diagnosis, prognosis, and therapeutic strategies.World journal of gastroenterology · 2025Review
- Integrating Feature Selection, Machine Learning, and SHAP Explainability to Predict Severe Acute Pancreatitis.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundSevere acute pancreatitis (SAP) can be fatal if left unrecognized and untreated. The purpose was to develop a machine learning (ML) model for predicting the 30-day all-cause mortality risk in SAP patients and to explain the most important predictors.
methodsThis research utilized six ML methods, including logistic regression (LR), k-nearest neighbors(KNN), support vector machines (SVM), naive Bayes (NB), random forests(RF), and extreme gradient boosting(XGBoost), to construct six predictive models for SAP. An extensive evaluation was conducted to determine the most effective model and then the Shapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP) method was applied to visualize key variables. Utilizing the optimized model, stratified predictions were made for patients with SAP. Further, the study employed multivariable Cox regression analysis and Kaplan-Meier survival curves, along with subgroup analysis, to explore the relationship between the machine learning-based score and 30-day mortality.
resultsThrough LASSO regression and recursive feature elimination (RFE), 25 optimal feature variables are selected. The XGBoost model performed best, with an area under the curve (AUC) of 0.881, a sensitivity of 0.5714, a specificity of 0.9651 and an F1 score of 0.64. The first six most important feature variables were the use of vasopressor, high Charlson comorbidity index, low blood oxygen saturation, history of malignant tumor, hyperglycemia and high APSIII score. Based on the optimal threshold of 0.62, patients were divided into high and low-risk groups, and the 30-day survival rate in the high-risk group decreased significantly. COX regression analysis further confirmed the positive correlation between high-risk scores and 30-day mortality. In the subgroup analysis, the model showed good risk stratification ability in patients with different gender, renal replacement therapy and with or without a history of malignant tumor, but it was not effective in predicting peripheral vascular disease.
conclusionsthe XGBoost model effectively predicts the severity of SAP, serving as a valuable tool for clinicians to identify SAP early.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.