ArticleBMC oral health2024
Masticatory function between chewing with and without wearing clear thermoplastic appliances.
Article in BMC oral health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
2 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundClear thermoplastic materials are used in a variety of oral appliances. In some situations, patients may wear clear thermoplastic appliances while eating. However, the effect of wearing clear thermoplastic appliances on chewing efficiency is unknown. This study aimed to evaluate the differences in masticatory function between chewing with and without wearing clear thermoplastic retainers over a 6-month period, and its associated factors.
methodsThirty patients who received upper and lower clear retainers after debonding fixed appliances were examined for objective and subjective masticatory function at retainer delivery (T0), 3-month (T1), and 6-month follow-ups (T2) in two conditions: with and without wearing their retainers while chewing. The objective method used multiple sieves reported as the median particle size (MPS). The food intake ability (FIA) test served as the subjective method. Paired t-test was used to compare the outcomes between chewing with and without retainers at each evaluation time point. Repeated measures ANOVA followed by the Bonferroni post-hoc test was used to compare the outcomes between the three evaluating time points. Multivariable linear regression analysis was performed to assess whether age, sex, and extraction/non-extraction was associated with these effects.
resultsThe MPS was significantly greater when chewing with retainers compared with chewing without them at T0 (P < 0.05), however, it was not significantly greater at T1 and T2 (P > 0.05). The MPS with and without the retainers tend to decrease between T0, T1 and T2. In particular, the MPS while chewing with retainers significantly decreased between T0 and T1. The total FIA score and FIA subscores for hard and soft food were significantly lower when eating with retainers at T0 (P < 0.05), however, all FIA scores when eating without retainers did not significantly change between T0, T1, and T2. No significantly associated factors were identified.
conclusionsWearing clear retainers while chewing decreases objective and subjective masticatory function immediately after completing orthodontic treatment. However, this significantly improved to levels comparable to chewing without retainers after a 3-month follow-up. Age, sex, and extraction/non-extraction treatment were not associated with the difference in masticatory function while chewing with and without wearing the retainers.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.