ArticleBMC public health2024
Cognitive disparity in online rumor perception: a group analysis during COVID-19.
Article in BMC public health, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 3 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
3 citing papers in PubMed.
- [Clinical Progress and Prospects of mRNA Tumor Drugs].Sichuan da xue xue bao. Yi xue ban = Journal of Sichuan University. Medical science edition · 2026Review
- Group cognitive space of online rumors in public health emergencies: a theoretical and empirical study.Frontiers in public health · 2026Article
- Short videos platforms as sources of health information about cervical cancer screening: A content and quality analysis.Digital healthArticle
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
4 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundThe harmonious cognitive alignment among various netizen groups is pivotal for the spread and amplification of online rumors. This alignment, characterized by shared cognitive inclinations, fosters uniformity in attitudes and perspectives, thereby precipitating synchronized engagement in the dissemination of such rumors. Notably, discernible disparities emerge in group cognition as different types of rumors pertaining to the same event propagate. This research endeavors to dissect the roles of netizen groups through the lens of cognitive variance, thereby attaining a more profound comprehension of the distinctive traits and behavioral dynamics of various netizen factions in the context of online rumor dissemination.
methodsBy integrating Bloom's taxonomy and crafting a survey questionnaire, this study captured the cognitive responses of netizens to various online rumor themes across two critical dimensions: (1) Information Cognition: exploring cognitive processing levels from basic recall to application and analysis and (2) Attitude Change: evaluating higher-order cognitive processes such as evaluating and creating in response to complex rumor scenarios. The decision tree classification algorithm was meticulously applied to dissect the catalysts behind the cognitive shifts among netizens. Additionally, the K-Means clustering algorithm was effectively utilized to categorize netizen groups along thematic lines, offering a nuanced view of their cognitive engagement.
resultsThe initial impression of a rumor significantly influences netizens' final cognitive perceptions. Twelve characteristics were observed in netizen groups during the dissemination of rumors on different themes, and these groups were classified into four categories: knowledge-oriented, competition-oriented, social-oriented, and entertainment-oriented, based on their cognitive differences.
conclusionsThroughout the lifecycle of online rumors, from inception to dissemination, diverse netizen groups assume distinct roles, each exerting a unique influence on the spread and reception of information. By implementing tailored governance strategies that are sensitive to the characteristics of these groups, it is possible to attain substantially more effective outcomes in managing the propagation of online rumors. This nuanced approach to governance recognizes the heterogeneity of the online community and leverages it to enhance the efficacy of interventions.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.