ArticleBMC medical education2024
Application of the online teaching model based on BOPPPS virtual simulation platform in preventive medicine undergraduate experiment.
Article in BMC medical education, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 12 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
12 citing papers in PubMed.
- Development and evaluation of a blended learning model integrating ARCS and BOPPPS for Endodontics education.BMC medical education · 2026Trial
- Evaluation of surgical visualization headset in dental education for preclinical bone augmentation surgery.BMC oral health · 2026Trial
- Does a virtual simulation teaching platform improve surgical training for medical undergraduate students?BMC surgery · 2025Trial
- Integrating Mini-CEX into a four-stage virtual simulation platform for clinical skills training: development and student evaluation.BMC medical education · 2026Article
- The impact of a decision tree-based BOPPPS blended teaching model on cognitive performance in clinical epidemiology.Frontiers in public health · 2026Observational
- Construction and application of a BOPPPS-based clinical teaching model in the operating room: effects on surgical-team performance and patient safety.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Application of mind mapping combined with case-based learning model using simulated clinical cases in nursing education.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- The impact of emotional value in digital teaching resources on learning motivation-an empirical analysis based on a questionnaire survey.Frontiers in psychology · 2026Article
- An empirical study of the BOPPPS teaching model in standardized training for vascular surgery residents: teaching of diabetic foot Wagner classification and surgical intervention strategies.Frontiers in medicine · 2026Article
- Analysis of the effectiveness of SPOC combined with BOPPPS teaching method in stoma care training for nurses in neonatal intensive care units.BMC medical education · 2025Article
- Study on design and practice of PBL teaching model based on STEM education concept.Scientific reports · 2025Article
- Construction of research feedback experimental teaching mode for medical undergraduate students and comparative study with traditional experimental teaching mode.BMC medical education · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundAs online teaching gains prevalence in higher education, traditional face-to-face methods are encountering limitations in meeting the demands of medical ethics, the availability of experimental resources, and essential experimental conditions. Consequently, under the guidance of the BOPPPS (bridge-in, objective, preassessment, participatory learning, postassessment, summary) teaching model, the application of virtual simulation platform has become a new trend. The purpose of this study is to explore the effect of BOPPPS combined with virtual simulation experimental teaching on students' scores and the evaluation of students' participation, performance and teachers' self-efficacy in preventive medicine experiment.
methodsStudents from Class 1 and Class 2 of 2019 preventive medicine major in Binzhou Medical University were selected as the research objects. The experimental group (class 2) (n = 51) received the teaching mode combined with BOPPPS and virtual simulation platform, while the control group (class 1) (n = 49) received the traditional experimental teaching method. After class, the experimental report scores, virtual simulation scores, students' engagement scale (SES), Biggs questionnaires, and teachers' sense of self-efficacy (TSES) questionnaires were analyzed.
resultsThe experimental report results demonstrated a significant increase in the total score of the experimental group and the scores of each of the four individual experiments compared to the control group (P < 0.05). To investigate the impact of the new teaching model on students' learning attitudes and patterns, as well as to evaluate teachers' self-efficacy, a questionnaire survey was administered following the course. The SES results showed that students in the experimental group had high performance scores on the two dimensions of learning methods and learning emotions (t = 2.476, t = 2.177; P = 0.015, P = 0.032). Furthermore, in the Biggs questionnaire, the total deep learning score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (t = 2.553, P = 0.012), and the deep learning motivation score of the experimental group was higher than that of the control group (t = 2.598, P = 0.011). The TSES questionnaire shows that most teachers think it is easier to manage students and the classroom and easier to implement teaching strategies under this mode.
conclusionsThe combination of BOPPPS and the virtual simulation platform effectively enhances the experimental environment for students, thereby improving their academic performance, engagement and learning approach in preventive medicine laboratory courses.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.