ArticleBMC nephrology2024
Decoy cells detected in the urine of a patient with complex karyotype Myelodysplastic neoplasms who underwent umbilical cord blood transplantation: a case report.
Article in BMC nephrology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
0 citing papers in PubMed.
No citing paper in PubMed yet.
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
5 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
backgroundCurrently, few literature reports document cases of decoy cells in the urine of umbilical cord blood transplant patients. The majority of the literature indicates that decoy cells are frequently identified in the urine of kidney transplant recipients. CASE PRESENTATION: This case report describes a patient with Myelodysplastic Neoplasms featuring a complex karyotype who underwent umbilical cord blood transplantation. Postoperative urinary cytology revealed decoy cells, and subsequent BK virus nucleic acid testing was positive. However, the routine use of antiviral drugs by the physicians led to insufficient attention to the decoy cells and BK virus, culminating in hemorrhagic cystitis.
conclusionsUrine cytology is a simple, intuitive, rapid, and cost-effective analytical method. The presence of decoy cells in the urine can serve as an indicator for infection screening and provide a clue for clinical doctors: Detection of decoy cells in urine should prompt a more vigorous antiviral response to mitigate the risk of complications like hemorrhagic cystitis.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.