Observational studyBMC anesthesiology2024
The evaluation of endotracheal tube cuff pressure in pediatric patients by subjective inflation techniques: a prospective observational study.
Observational study in BMC anesthesiology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
1 citing paper in PubMed.
- Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
8 authors.
Funding
Abstract
backgroundCuffed endotracheal tubes (ETTs) are commonly used in pediatric patients, with the gold standard for measuring cuff pressure being a cuff pressure manometer. However, this equipment is not always available in every operating room. Subjective inflation techniques, such as the minimal occluding volume (MOV) technique and the stethoscope-guided (Steth) technique, offer convenient and safe alternatives to standard methods but do not provide quantitative measurements. This study aimed to evaluate ETT cuff pressures and volumes of air inflated using the two subjective techniques (MOV and Steth) in pediatric patients.
methodsThis prospective observational study was conducted at the Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Khon Kaen University, Thailand. We included healthy pediatric patients aged 2 to 7 years undergoing elective surgeries under general anesthesia with a cuffed ETT. The primary objective of this study was to compare the mean ETT cuff pressures and volumes of air inflated using the two subjective inflation techniques (MOV and Steth method). The secondary objectives include identifying factors associated with inappropriate inflation and evaluating post-intubation complications.
resultsSixty-four pediatric patients were analyzed. The overall mean ETT cuff pressure was 26.52 ± 8.68 cmH
conclusionsSubjective inflation techniques (MOV or Steth) achieve target ETT cuff pressures in less than 50%, and carry the risks of both overinflation and underinflation, even without post-intubation complications.
trial registrationTCTR20211016001 (registered with the Thai Clinical Trials Registry on October 16, 2021).
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.