ReviewEuropean journal of human genetics : EJHG2025
Genetic testing for monogenic forms of motor neuron disease/amyotrophic lateral sclerosis in unaffected family members.
Review in European journal of human genetics : EJHG, 2025. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 5 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
5 citing papers in PubMed.
- Presymptomatic Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis: From Early Biomarker Detection to Phenoconversion Prediction.Diagnostics (Basel, Switzerland) · 2026Review
- Unravelling the Significance of Cystatin C and Bunina Bodies in Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis Pathogenesis.Neuropathology and applied neurobiology · 2026Review
- SOD1 Variants in Patients With Amyotrophic Lateral Sclerosis in Central Eastern Europe: From Genetic Testing to SOD1 Targeted Therapy.European journal of neurology · 2026Article
- Genetic variants among patients with motor neuron disease in Lithuania - a retrospective single-center study.Neurogenetics · 2026Article
- Genomic sequencing technologies for rare disease in mainstream healthcare: the current state of implementation.European journal of human genetics : EJHG · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Motor neuron disease (MND), also referred to as amyotrophic lateral sclerosis (ALS), is a monogenic disease in a minority of cases, with autosomal dominant inheritance. Increasing numbers of people with MND are requesting genetic testing, and indeed receiving a genetic diagnosis. Consequently, requests for genetic counselling and predictive testing (i.e. of unaffected family members) are similarly expected to rise, alongside pre-symptomatic clinical trials. Despite this, there is no evidence-based guideline for predictive genetic testing in MND. This paper provides an overview of the genomic basis of MND, focusing specifically on the most common monogenic causes of MND. It then lays out the complexities of MND predictive testing, including the genetic landscape characterised by incomplete penetrance, clinical and genetic heterogeneity, and an oligogenic mechanism of pathogenesis in some cases. Additionally, there is limited research on the psychosocial impact of predictive genetic testing for MND, with studies suggesting potential difficulty in adjusting to the news, in part due to a lack of support and follow-up. This underscores a case for evidence-based, disease-specific guidance for predictive testing in MND.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.