Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39501076›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Construction and validation of a clinical prediction model for sepsis using peripheral perfusion index to predict in-hospital and 28-day mortality risk.

Qirui Guo, Wenbo Li, Jie Wang, Guangjian Wang, Qingyu Deng, Hui Lian, Xiaoting Wang

Abstract readValidation Study
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 6 papers, 1 of them a synthesis that pooled it.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
6citing papers in PubMed, 1 pooled it
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

6 citing papers in PubMed, 1 synthesis or guideline pooled it.

  1. Pooled it
  2. Article
  3. Article
  4. Article
  5. Article
  6. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

7 authors.

Qirui GuoDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Wenbo LiDepartment of Neurology, Beijing Tiantan Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China.
Jie WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Guangjian WangDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Qingyu DengDepartment of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China.
Hui Lian *Department of Health Care, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. lianhui@pumch.cn.
Xiaoting Wang *Department of Critical Care Medicine, Peking Union Medical College Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, 100730, China. wangxiaoting@pumch.cn.

Funding

National High Level Hospital Clinical Research Funding 2022-PUMCH-A-221
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Sepsis is a clinical syndrome caused by infection, leading to organ dysfunction due to a dysregulated host response. In recent years, its high mortality rate has made it a significant cause of death and disability worldwide. The pathophysiological process of sepsis is related to the body's dysregulated response to infection, with microcirculatory changes serving as early warning signals that guide clinical treatment. The Peripheral Perfusion Index (PI), as an indicator of peripheral microcirculation, can effectively evaluate patient prognosis. This study aims to develop two new prediction models using PI and other common clinical indicators to assess the mortality risk of sepsis patients during hospitalization and within 28 days post-ICU admission. This retrospective study analyzed data from sepsis patients treated in the Intensive Care Unit of Peking Union Medical College Hospital between December 2019 and June 2023, ultimately including 645 patients. LASSO regression and logistic regression analyses were used to select predictive factors from 35 clinical indicators, and two clinical prediction models were constructed to predict in-hospital mortality and 28-day mortality. The models' performance was then evaluated using ROC curve, calibration curve, and decision curve analyses. The two prediction models performed excellently in distinguishing patient mortality risk. The AUC for the in-hospital mortality prediction model was 0.82 in the training set and 0.73 in the validation set; for the 28-day mortality prediction model, the AUC was 0.79 in the training set and 0.73 in the validation set. The calibration curves closely aligned with the ideal line, indicating consistency between predicted and actual outcomes. Decision curve analysis also demonstrated high net benefits for the clinical utility of both models. The study shows that these two prediction models not only perform excellently statistically but also hold high practical value in clinical applications. The models can help physicians accurately assess the mortality risk of sepsis patients, providing a scientific basis for personalized treatment.

Indexed as

Hospital MortalityPerfusion IndexSepsisAdultAgedFemaleHumansIntensive Care UnitsMaleMiddle AgedPrognosisRetrospective StudiesRisk AssessmentRisk FactorsROC Curve28-day mortalityClinical prediction modelIn-hospital mortalityLASSO regressionPeripheral perfusion index (PI)Sepsis

Identifiers

PMID39501076
PMCPMC11538300

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.