ArticleScientific reports2024
Relationships between personality factors and DC/TMD Axis II scores of psychosocial impairment among patients with pain related temporomandibular disorders.
Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 7 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
7 citing papers in PubMed.
- Oral Behaviors, Anxiety, and Depression in Temporomandibular Disorders: A Conceptual Narrative Review Within the DC/TMD Axis II Framework.Medicina (Kaunas, Lithuania) · 2026Review
- Psychological and somatosensory correlates of temporomandibular disorder: anxiety, somatosensory amplification, and coping strategies-a biopsychosocial perspective.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Online validation of DC/TMD Axis II questionnaires for assessing temporomandibular disorders.Journal of oral & facial pain and headache · 2026Article
- Temporomandibular disorders among adult patients: Relationship with personality traits and other factors.PloS one · 2026Article
- Assessing, categorizing and proposing the therapeutic effect of complete dentures on temporomandibular disorders analyzed by craniomandibular index: a prospective interventional study.BMC oral health · 2025Article
- Temporomandibular disorders and mental health: shared etiologies and treatment approaches.The journal of headache and pain · 2025Review
- Mechanisms for Orofacial Pain: Roles of Immunomodulation, Metabolic Reprogramming, Oxidative Stress and Epigenetic Regulation.Biomedicines · 2025Review
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
1 author.
Funding
Abstract
This cross-sectional analytical study aimed to assess the relationship between personality factors and the DC/TMD Axis II scores of psychosocial impairment among patients with pain related temporomandibular disorders (TMD). 120 participants (60 females and 60 males) who were diagnosed with pain related TMD according to the Axis I DC/TMD protocol were recruited. The participants were requested to complete four tests including the NEO Five Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) to assess personality factors and three Axis II DC/TMD tools; the Graded Chronic Pain Scale (GCPS) Version 2.0 to assess TMD pain intensity and pain-related disability, Patient Health Questionnaire-4 (PHQ-4) to assess psychological distress due to TMD pain, and Generalized Anxiety Disorder-7 (GAD-7) to assess patients' stress reactivity. Results showed that 49.2% of the participants experienced high intensity of characteristic pain, 14.2% reported pain related disability more than 30 days (grade 3 disability days) and had disability scores of 70 or above (grade 3 disability scores), 16.7% demonstrated severe distress, and 18.3% reported severe anxiety due to TMD pain. Females scored higher on all these variables than males (P < .05). Multiple regression analyses indicated that higher extraversion scores, higher agreeableness scores and being a female were associated with higher intensity of characteristic pain (p < .05). Also, higher neuroticism and agreeableness scores were associated with more disability days (p < .05). In addition, higher agreeableness scores were associated with higher disability scores and disability point values (p < .05). Furthermore, lower neuroticism scores and being a female were associated with higher PHQ total scores, while being a female and having a lower level of education were associated with higher GAD total scores (p < .05). In conclusion, personality profiles and gender significantly impact the DC/TMD Axis II scores of psychosocial impairment among patients with pain related TMD.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.