Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39501039›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

Arrested development and increased incidence of sandprawn embryonic aberrations along an intertidal human recreation gradient.

K A Madell, U M Scharler, C Savage, A M L Karlson, D Pillay

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Not yet cited in PubMed.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
0citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

0 citing papers in PubMed.

No citing paper in PubMed yet.

4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

5 authors.

K A MadellMarine & Antarctic Research Centre for Innovation & Sustainability, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.
U M ScharlerSchool of Life Sciences, University of KwaZulu-Natal, Westville Campus, Durban, 4001, South Africa.
C SavageMarine & Antarctic Research Centre for Innovation & Sustainability, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa.
A M L KarlsonDepartment of Ecology, Environment and Plant Science, Stockholm University, Svante Arrhenius Väg 20, 106 91, Stockholm, Sweden.
D PillayMarine & Antarctic Research Centre for Innovation & Sustainability, Department of Biological Sciences, University of Cape Town, Cape Town, 7701, South Africa. Deena.Pillay@uct.ac.za.

Funding

National Research Foundation of South Africa 136484
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Anthropogenic pressures are increasing in coastal ecosystems globally, yet identifying robust indicators of change and managing coastal resources can be complicated by phenotypic plasticity and differential life-history responses of key organisms. We illustrate this using biogeochemical and sandprawn (Kraussillichirus kraussi) response metrics along a human recreation gradient (trampling, sandprawn harvesting) in a South African lagoonal ecosystem. Benthic compaction, oxygen depletion and high porewater ammonia concentrations were associated with greatest recreation intensity. Sandprawn abundance was similar across the recreation gradient and body condition was counter-intuitively greater in areas with maximum recreation, but with higher frequencies of embryonic aberrations and arrested development. These findings suggest different vulnerabilities of life-history stages of sandprawns to recreation, with embryonic stages being highly susceptible. We suggest that embryonic aberrations and developmental changes in endobenthic crustaceans may be sensitive bioindicators of recreation-induced changes in sedimentary systems.

Indexed as

EcosystemRecreationAnimalsCrustaceaGeologic SedimentsHumansSouth Africa

Identifiers

PMID39501039
PMCPMC11538353

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.