ArticleCommunications biology2024
Knowledge-based inductive bias and domain adaptation for cell type annotation.
Article in Communications biology, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 4 papers.
What it found
Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.
The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.
The trial behind it
Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.
Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.
Who cites it
4 citing papers in PubMed.
- scProtoTransformer: Scalable reference mapping across molecules, cells, and donors.Science advances · 2026Article
- Article
- scKAN: interpretable single-cell analysis for cell-type-specific gene discovery and drug repurposing via Kolmogorov-Arnold networks.Genome biology · 2025Article
- Decoding metastatic microenvironments through single-cell omics reveals new insights into niche dynamics and tumor evolution.PLoS biology · 2025Article
Corrections and comments
PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.
Authors and funding
6 authors.
Funding
No grant is acknowledged in the PubMed record.
Abstract
Measurement techniques often result in domain gaps among batches of cellular data from a specific modality. The effectiveness of cross-batch annotation methods is influenced by inductive bias, which refers to a set of assumptions that describe the behavior of model predictions. Different annotation methods possess distinct inductive biases, leading to varying degrees of generalizability and interpretability. Given that certain cell types exhibit unique functional patterns, we hypothesize that the inductive biases of cell annotation methods should align with these biological patterns to produce meaningful predictions. In this study, we propose KIDA, Knowledge-based Inductive bias and Domain Adaptation. The knowledge-based inductive bias constrains the prediction rules learned from the reference dataset, composed of multiple batches, to functional patterns relevant to biology, thereby enhancing the generalization of the model to unseen batches. Since the query dataset also contains gaps from multiple batches, KIDA's domain adaptation employs pseudo labels for self-knowledge distillation, effectively narrowing the distribution gap between model predictions and the query dataset. Benchmark experiments demonstrate that KIDA is capable of achieving accurate cross-batch cell type annotation.
Indexed as
Identifiers
What OpenQuestion holds
Registered trials
Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.