Evidence map›Paper›PMID 39501008›Full record

ArticleScientific reports2024

A tied-weight autoencoder for the linear dimensionality reduction of sample data.

Sunhee Kim, Sang-Ho Chu, Yong-Jin Park, Chang-Yong Lee

Abstract read
In one paragraph

Article in Scientific reports, 2024. The graph could read no effect estimate from its abstract, so it casts no vote on the map. Cited by 1 paper.

0numbers the graph read from it
0cells of the map it votes in
1citing papers in PubMed
–field-weighted citation impact
1 · What the graph read from it

What it found

Each row is one number read from the abstract, on the scale the paper reported it, with its interval. Left of the dashed line favours the treatment, right favours the comparator. Under each row is the sentence it came from. New to these charts? A ten-minute tutorial.

The abstract states no effect estimate the extractor could read, or names no intervention and outcome on the map, so this paper lights no cell and moves no belief. It is still indexed, cited and linked below.

2 · The registry

The trial behind it

Trials whose registry record cites this paper, or whose number appears in the abstract. A trial that started after this paper was published is citing it as background, not reporting it.

Neither the registry nor the abstract names a trial number. If this is a trial report, that itself is worth knowing.

3 · Its place in the literature

Who cites it

1 citing paper in PubMed.

  1. Article
4 · The record

Corrections and comments

PubMed lists nothing against this paper. Absence here is not a guarantee, only a check that was made.

5 · Who and what money

Authors and funding

4 authors.

Sunhee KimThe Department of Industrial Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan, 31080, Republic of Korea.
Sang-Ho ChuThe Department of Plant Resources, Kongju National University, Yesan, 32439, Republic of Korea.
Yong-Jin ParkThe Department of Plant Resources, Kongju National University, Yesan, 32439, Republic of Korea.
Chang-Yong LeeThe Department of Industrial Engineering, Kongju National University, Cheonan, 31080, Republic of Korea. clee@kongju.ac.kr.

Funding

Cooperative Research Program for Agriculture Science and Technology Development RS-2023-00222739Kongju National University Kongju National University in 2022National Research Foundation of Korea 2022R1A4A1030348
6 · The paper itself

Abstract

Dimensionality reduction is a method used in machine learning and data science to reduce the dimensions in a dataset. While linear methods are generally less effective at dimensionality reduction than nonlinear methods, they can provide a linear relationship between the original data and the dimensionality-reduced representation, leading to better interpretability. In this research, we present a tied-weight autoencoder as a dimensionality reduction model with the merit of both linear and nonlinear methods. Although the tied-weight autoencoder is a nonlinear dimensionality reduction model, we approximate it to function as a linear model. This is achieved by removing the hidden layer units that are largely inactivated by the input data, while preserving the model's effectiveness. We evaluate the proposed model by comparing its performance with other linear and nonlinear models using benchmark datasets. Our results show that the proposed model performs comparably to the nonlinear model of a similar autoencoder structure to the proposed model. More importantly, we show that the proposed model outperforms the linear models in various metrics, including the mean square error, data reconstruction, and the classification of low-dimensional projections of the input data. Thus, our study provides general recommendations for best practices in dimensionality reduction.

Indexed as

Code sizeData reconstructionDimensionality reductionMean square errorTied-weight autoencoder

Identifiers

PMID39501008
PMCPMC11538474

What OpenQuestion holds

Textmetadata
LicenceCC BY-NC-ND
Read underepoch 390

Registered trials

None linked

Read under generation 80e0d062 · epoch 390. Bibliography from PubMed, PubMed Central and OpenAlex; grants from NIH RePORTER; trial links from ClinicalTrials.gov; estimates, votes and beliefs from the OpenQuestion graph.